Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

357 #376

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 20, 2020
Merged

357 #376

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 20, 2020

Conversation

dgarus
Copy link
Contributor

@dgarus dgarus commented Feb 13, 2020

Issue #357

We cannot remove the 'since' tag because it is mandatory for the current check style policy.

Additionally, I've created the issue in qulice.
That is why I didn't remove the JavadocTagsCheck tag from Base.java and DefaultBase.java.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 13, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #376 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #376   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     77.98%   77.98%           
  Complexity      204      204           
=========================================
  Files            36       36           
  Lines          1190     1190           
  Branches         88       88           
=========================================
  Hits            928      928           
  Misses          232      232           
  Partials         30       30

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ae1caa2...3223d51. Read the comment docs.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 13, 2020

This pull request #376 is assigned to @fabriciofx/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @paulodamaso/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be no monetary reward for this job

@paulodamaso
Copy link
Collaborator

@0crat assign @fanifieiev

Copy link

@fanifieiev fanifieiev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dgarus Please update the description section with the issue link this PR is fixing/resolving.
I need to understand the context and intention of this PR.
Thanks

@dgarus
Copy link
Contributor Author

dgarus commented Feb 13, 2020

@fanifieiev Done.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 13, 2020

@0crat assign @fanifieiev (here)

@paulodamaso @paulodamaso/z not enough funds available in the project, can't set budget of job #376, see §21; @fanifieiev/z will get no money on completion; in order to fix that, add funds to the project and assign the job again

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 13, 2020

Manual assignment of issues is discouraged, see §19: -5 point(s) just awarded to @paulodamaso/z

Copy link

@fanifieiev fanifieiev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dgarus Please fix the merge conflict issue and have a look at the comment.
After you fix them, we should be good to merge this PR.

src/main/java/org/jpeek/Main.java Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@dgarus
Copy link
Contributor Author

dgarus commented Feb 18, 2020

@fanifieiev Done.
Thanks!

@fanifieiev
Copy link

@paulodamaso We are good to merge.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 18, 2020

@fanifieiev/z this job was assigned to you 5days ago. It will be taken away from you soon, unless you close it, see §8. Read this and this, please.

@paulodamaso
Copy link
Collaborator

@rultor merge

@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Feb 20, 2020

@rultor merge

@paulodamaso OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@rultor rultor merged commit 3223d51 into cqfn:master Feb 20, 2020
@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Feb 20, 2020

@rultor merge

@paulodamaso Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 20min)

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 20, 2020

Job #376 is not in the agenda of @fanifieiev/z, can't retrieve data and time of add

@dgarus dgarus deleted the 357 branch February 20, 2020 12:10
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 20, 2020

Job #376 is not in the agenda of @fanifieiev/z, can't inspect

@0crat 0crat removed the scope label Feb 20, 2020
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 20, 2020

@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @fanifieiev/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 20, 2020

Payment to ARC for a closed pull request, as in §28: +10 point(s) just awarded to @paulodamaso/z

@sereshqua
Copy link

@fanifieiev please make sure you will find at least 3 issues during next CR, thanks :)

@sereshqua
Copy link

@fanifieiev ping

@sereshqua
Copy link

@0crat quality acceptable

@fanifieiev
Copy link

@sereshqua ok, got it

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 23, 2020

Order was finished, quality is "acceptable": +15 point(s) just awarded to @fanifieiev/z

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Feb 23, 2020

Quality review completed: +4 point(s) just awarded to @sereshqua/z

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants