-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
357 #376
357 #376
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #376 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 77.98% 77.98%
Complexity 204 204
=========================================
Files 36 36
Lines 1190 1190
Branches 88 88
=========================================
Hits 928 928
Misses 232 232
Partials 30 30 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
This pull request #376 is assigned to @fabriciofx/z, here is why; the budget is 15 minutes, see §4; please, read §27 and when you decide to accept the changes, inform @paulodamaso/z (the architect) right in this ticket; if you decide that this PR should not be accepted ever, also inform the architect; this blog post will help you understand what is expected from a code reviewer; there will be no monetary reward for this job |
@0crat assign @fanifieiev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dgarus Please update the description section with the issue link this PR is fixing/resolving.
I need to understand the context and intention of this PR.
Thanks
@fanifieiev Done. |
@paulodamaso @paulodamaso/z not enough funds available in the project, can't set budget of job #376, see §21; @fanifieiev/z will get no money on completion; in order to fix that, add funds to the project and assign the job again |
Manual assignment of issues is discouraged, see §19: -5 point(s) just awarded to @paulodamaso/z |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dgarus Please fix the merge conflict issue and have a look at the comment.
After you fix them, we should be good to merge this PR.
@fanifieiev Done. |
@paulodamaso We are good to merge. |
@fanifieiev/z this job was assigned to you 5days ago. It will be taken away from you soon, unless you close it, see §8. Read this and this, please. |
@rultor merge |
@paulodamaso OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here |
@paulodamaso Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 20min) |
Job #376 is not in the agenda of @fanifieiev/z, can't retrieve data and time of add |
Job #376 is not in the agenda of @fanifieiev/z, can't inspect |
@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @fanifieiev/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed |
Payment to |
@fanifieiev please make sure you will find at least 3 issues during next CR, thanks :) |
@fanifieiev ping |
@0crat quality acceptable |
@sereshqua ok, got it |
Order was finished, quality is "acceptable": +15 point(s) just awarded to @fanifieiev/z |
Quality review completed: +4 point(s) just awarded to @sereshqua/z |
Issue #357
We cannot remove the 'since' tag because it is mandatory for the current check style policy.
Additionally, I've created the issue in qulice.
That is why I didn't remove the JavadocTagsCheck tag from Base.java and DefaultBase.java.