[intro.refs], [numeric.limits] Remove all references to ISO/IEC 10967-1:2012#8667
Open
eisenwave wants to merge 1 commit intocplusplus:mainfrom
Open
[intro.refs], [numeric.limits] Remove all references to ISO/IEC 10967-1:2012#8667eisenwave wants to merge 1 commit intocplusplus:mainfrom
eisenwave wants to merge 1 commit intocplusplus:mainfrom
Conversation
jwakely
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2026
Member
jwakely
left a comment
jwakely
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We already have normative wording that some members (corresponding to infinities, NaNs, subnormals etc.) are required when is_iec559 is true, so I don't think we lose anything by removing the footnotes about LIA-1.
jensmaurer
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #8666.
Note that Jonathan wants SG6 to give an ack; see #8666 (comment)