Open
Description
The synopsis for in [simd.syn] goes against our usual formatting conventions in a few ways:
- Some of the section comments (e.g.
// [simd.bit], Bit manipulation
) have a capitalized title. To my knowledge, it should bebit manipulation
. assoc_laguerre
andassoc_legendre
have improperly aligned parameters.lerp
and a few other functions do not correctly indent the function name when the previous line is dedicated to a return type.
There are also some things that are not incorrect, but very ugly, like:
template<simd-type V>
constexpr rebind_t<make_signed_t<typename V::value_type>, V>
countl_zero(const V& v) noexcept;
template<simd-type V>
constexpr rebind_t<make_signed_t<typename V::value_type>, V> countl_one(const V& v) noexcept;
countl_zero
is not properly indented, but that's not what I'm pointing out here. Rather, countl_one
is put all on one line solely because it's one character shorter. I think it would be much less ugly if we formatted countl_zero
and countl_one
the same.
Obviously, any such fixups should be done after post-Sofia motions.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels