Search results

[basic.type.qualifier] *const object* definition does not include objects nested within const objects by byte arrays that provide storage

Status: Open.

#793 In cplusplus/CWG;

· MitalAshok opened on Nov 1, 2025

[expr.const] Should literal-ness of the element type invalidate constexpr allocation?

Status: Open.

#792 In cplusplus/CWG;

· frederick-vs-ja opened on Nov 1, 2025

[temp.param] Correctly handle template parameter objects of array type

Status: Open.

#791 In cplusplus/CWG;

· katzdm opened on Oct 30, 2025

[cpp.predefined] Core language feature-test macros of future values

Status: Open.

#790 In cplusplus/CWG;

· frederick-vs-ja opened on Oct 30, 2025

[expr.reflect] ^^type-id vs. type aliases

Status: Open.

#789 In cplusplus/CWG;

· jakubjelinek opened on Oct 29, 2025

CWG3102 [basic.fundamental] Allow expressions of type <code>void</code> in a requires-expression

Status: Open.

#788 In cplusplus/CWG;

· eisenwave opened on Oct 29, 2025

[stmt.pre] p1 Whether an evaluation is executed is in terms of control flow

Status: Open.

#787 In cplusplus/CWG;

· xmh0511 opened on Oct 28, 2025

[temp.alias] Misleading note "An alias template name is never deduced."

Status: Open.

#786 In cplusplus/CWG;

· t3nsor opened on Oct 27, 2025

[lex.universal.char] Redundant exclusion of (non-existent) UCNs in r-char-sequences

Status: Open.

#785 In cplusplus/CWG;

· hubert-reinterpretcast opened on Oct 27, 2025

[class.protected] Update to cover splices

Status: Open.

#784 In cplusplus/CWG;

· katzdm opened on Oct 25, 2025

[intro.execution] p7 Does the evaluation that initates a side effect need to be executed by the thread to produce the side effect

Status: Open.

#783 In cplusplus/CWG;

· xmh0511 opened on Oct 21, 2025

CWG3099 [temp.inst] Instantiation of type aliases from alias templates unspecified

Status: Open.

#782 In cplusplus/CWG;

· hubert-reinterpretcast opened on Oct 20, 2025