fix: Fix load_oauth & Bump version to 0.10.2

[chyroc]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • None

• Bug Fixes

  • None

• Documentation

  • None

• Refactor

  • Updated load_oauth_app_from_config function to accept a dictionary instead of a JSON string

• Chores

  • Bumped project version from 0.10.1 to 0.10.2

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the cozepy library, focusing on two main aspects. First, the load_oauth_app_from_config function in the authentication module now accepts a dictionary instead of a JSON string, simplifying its implementation. Second, the project version has been incremented from 0.10.1 to 0.10.2 across multiple configuration files, indicating a minor update to the library.

Changes

File	Change Summary
cozepy/auth/__init__.py	Updated load_oauth_app_from_config function to accept a dictionary instead of a JSON string
cozepy/version.py	Bumped version from "0.10.1" to "0.10.2"
pyproject.toml	Updated project version from "0.10.1" to "0.10.2"

Poem

🐰 A version hop, a function's grace,
Dictionaries dance with newfound pace
No more JSON's tangled string
Simplicity now takes its wing
Cozepy grows, version light and bright! 🚀

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 137922d and 353145a.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• cozepy/auth/__init__.py (1 hunks)
• cozepy/version.py (1 hunks)
• pyproject.toml (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)

• pyproject.toml
• cozepy/version.py

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)

• GitHub Check: test (Python 3.8 on macOS)
• GitHub Check: test (Python 3.8 on Windows)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

cozepy/auth/__init__.py (1)

Line range hint 663-679: Verify the impact of this change on existing configurations.

The function now expects a dictionary instead of a JSON string. This is a breaking change that could affect existing code that passes JSON strings.

Let's check for any JSON string usage in the codebase:

Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.88%. Comparing base (137922d) to head (353145a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #165      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.87%   89.88%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          63       63              
  Lines        5767     5765       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         5183     5182       -1     
+ Misses        584      583       -1     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
cozepy/auth/__init__.py	88.02% <100.00%> (+0.24%)	⬆️
cozepy/version.py	90.32% <100.00%> (ø)