Skip to content

chore: fix in the file testutils_test.go #1039

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 11, 2025
Merged

Conversation

dedyshkaPexto
Copy link
Contributor

@dedyshkaPexto dedyshkaPexto commented Jan 18, 2025

Pull Request: Typo Fix in testutils_test.go

Description

This pull request fixes a typo in the testutils_test.go file. Specifically, the word "desribed" was corrected to "described" in a comment within the code.

Changes Made

  • Fixed a typo in a comment:
    • Original: // assertIterator confirms that the iterator returns the expected values desribed by mirror in the same order.
    • Updated: // assertIterator confirms that the iterator returns the expected values described by mirror in the same order.

Why This Change is Necessary

  • To improve code readability and maintain high-quality documentation.

Checklist

  • Code changes are well-documented.
  • No functional code was altered, only a comment was updated.
  • Code compiles successfully after the changes.

Related Issues

N/A

Additional Notes

  • This is a non-functional change that does not impact the logic or execution of the program.

Thank you for reviewing this pull request! 🎉

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Improved the clarity and consistency of in-app text by correcting a minor typographical error. This subtle update ensures that user-facing documentation is both precise and professionally presented, contributing to a smoother informational experience. Overall, this update reinforces the quality and reliability of our guidance without altering any visible functionality.

@dedyshkaPexto dedyshkaPexto requested a review from a team January 18, 2025 14:55
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 18, 2025

Walkthrough

The change fixes a typographical error in the comment for the assertIterator function in the testutils_test.go file. The misspelled word "desribed" has been corrected to "described." No modifications have been made to the functionality or public interfaces of the code.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
testutils_test.go Comment correction: fixed typo in assertIterator function ("desribed" → "described")

Poem

I’m a bunny in a code-filled glen,
Hopping through lines with my typing pen,
Fixed a typo that made me grin,
Code now clear for all to begin,
Carrots and code, let the adventures spin!

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 golangci-lint (1.64.8)

Error: you are using a configuration file for golangci-lint v2 with golangci-lint v1: please use golangci-lint v2
Failed executing command with error: you are using a configuration file for golangci-lint v2 with golangci-lint v1: please use golangci-lint v2

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 927e1a6 and 9a8ab9f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • testutils_test.go (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
  • GitHub Check: Test
  • GitHub Check: Benchmarks
🔇 Additional comments (1)
testutils_test.go (1)

286-287: Typo Correction in Comment for assertIterator

The updated comment now correctly spells "described" instead of "desribed." This minor change improves the documentation's clarity without affecting functionality.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@aljo242 aljo242 enabled auto-merge (squash) April 11, 2025 16:28
@aljo242 aljo242 changed the title Typo fix in the file testutils_test.go chore: fix in the file testutils_test.go Apr 11, 2025
@aljo242 aljo242 merged commit 49c26d6 into cosmos:master Apr 11, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants