docs(x/bank): fix function comments #22039
Conversation
beepdeepor
requested review from
julienrbrt,
hieuvubk,
akhilkumarpilli and
a team
as code owners
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on renaming methods within the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
x/bank/v2/keeper/restriction.go (3)
49-52: LGTM with a minor suggestion for documentation improvement.The renaming of
AppendSendRestrictiontoAppendGlobalSendRestrictionenhances clarity by explicitly indicating the global nature of the restriction. The internal logic remains correct.Consider updating the documentation to be more specific:
-// AppendGlobalSendRestriction adds the provided SendRestrictionFn to run after previously provided global restrictions. +// AppendGlobalSendRestriction appends the provided SendRestrictionFn to the existing global send restrictions. +// The appended restriction will be executed after any previously added global restrictions.
54-57: LGTM with a minor suggestion for documentation improvement.The renaming of
PrependSendRestrictiontoPrependGlobalSendRestrictionenhances clarity by explicitly indicating the global nature of the restriction. The internal logic remains correct.Consider updating the documentation to be more specific:
-// PrependGlobalSendRestriction adds the provided SendRestrictionFn to run before previously provided global restrictions. +// PrependGlobalSendRestriction prepends the provided SendRestrictionFn to the existing global send restrictions. +// The prepended restriction will be executed before any previously added global restrictions.
59-62: LGTM with a minor suggestion for documentation improvement.The renaming of
ClearSendRestrictiontoClearGlobalSendRestrictionenhances clarity by explicitly indicating the global nature of the restriction being cleared. The internal logic remains correct.Consider updating the documentation to be more specific:
-// ClearGlobalSendRestriction removes the global send restriction (if there is one). +// ClearGlobalSendRestriction removes all global send restrictions, if any exist. +// After calling this method, no global send restrictions will be applied.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- x/bank/v2/keeper/restriction.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
x/bank/v2/keeper/restriction.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
x/bank/v2/keeper/restriction.go (1)
49-62: Overall, these changes improve API clarity and consistency.The renaming of
AppendSendRestriction,PrependSendRestriction, andClearSendRestrictionto include "Global" in their names enhances the API's clarity. This change makes it explicit that these methods deal with global send restrictions, which can prevent potential misunderstandings for users of this API.The internal logic of the methods remains unchanged, which is correct as the functionality itself hasn't changed. The documentation updates are consistent with the name changes, although they could be slightly improved as suggested in the individual comments.
These changes align well with the PR objective of fixing function comments and improve the overall quality of the codebase.
Description
Refer to #19585
Introduced by #21925
Summary by CodeRabbit