Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: using pre-defined flag variables #21794

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

lilasxie
Copy link
Contributor

@lilasxie lilasxie commented Sep 18, 2024

Description

Using pre-defined flag variables if possible to reduce the maintenance of these string values

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved configuration handling by replacing hardcoded strings with constants, enhancing readability and reducing potential errors.
  • Refactor

    • Updated configuration setup in the application to utilize defined constants for better maintainability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@lilasxie has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 48 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f8dc12 and 6b4bfe5.

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve updating the configuration access methods in the test files server/v2/config_test.go and simapp/v2/app_test.go. Specifically, hardcoded string literals for configuration keys have been replaced with defined constants. This modification aims to enhance code readability and maintainability without altering the overall functionality of the application.

Changes

Files Change Summary
server/v2/config_test.go, simapp/v2/app_test.go Updated configuration access by replacing hardcoded string literals with constants (grpc.FlagAddress and store.FlagAppDBBackend). No alterations to exported or public entities were made.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2 label Sep 18, 2024
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK! Thank you

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit f283f0c Sep 18, 2024
70 of 71 checks passed
@lilasxie lilasxie deleted the chore/using-flag branch September 18, 2024 08:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants