-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: using unsafe.String and unsafe.SliceData #21412
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes include updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant UnsafeBytesToStr
participant Unsafe
Caller->>UnsafeBytesToStr: Call with byte slice
UnsafeBytesToStr->>Unsafe: Use unsafe.String and unsafe.SliceData
Unsafe-->>UnsafeBytesToStr: Return constructed string
UnsafeBytesToStr-->>Caller: Return string
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
CHANGELOG.md (2)
49-49
: Enhance documentation with impact explanation.Consider adding a brief explanation of the potential impact or benefits of using
unsafe.String
andunsafe.SliceData
to provide more context to the readers.Example:
* (internal) [#21412](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/21412) Using unsafe.String and unsafe.SliceData for improved performance and memory handling.
51-51
: Specify the exact version where behavior was changed.Consider specifying the exact version where the behavior was changed to provide more context to the readers.
Example:
* (baseapp) [#21256](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/21256) Halt height will not commit the block indicated, meaning that if halt-height is set to 10, only blocks until 9 (included) will be committed. This is to go back to the original behavior before a change was introduced in v0.50.0 (exact version).
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- internal/conv/string.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
internal/conv/string.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.CHANGELOG.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md
: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
Additional comments not posted (2)
internal/conv/string.go (2)
Line range hint
7-9
: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and the warning about altering the returned bytes is appropriate.
The code changes are approved.
18-18
: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and the use of
unsafe
is appropriate for the intended purpose.The code changes are approved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
UnsafeBytesToStr
is internal to many components, could you do a search and modify it there?
0a35f44
to
e8e596f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- codec/address/bech32_codec.go (2 hunks)
- codec/address/bech32_codec_test.go (2 hunks)
- internal/conv/string.go (1 hunks)
- internal/conv/string_test.go (1 hunks)
- types/address.go (4 hunks)
- types/address/hash.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- internal/conv/string_test.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (5)
internal/conv/string.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.types/address/hash.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.codec/address/bech32_codec.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.codec/address/bech32_codec_test.go (2)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Pattern
**/*_test.go
: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"types/address.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (7)
internal/conv/string.go (1)
Line range hint
5-7
: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented with appropriate warnings about potential segmentation faults.
The code changes are approved.
types/address/hash.go (1)
93-93
: LGTM! But ensure thorough testing.The use of
unsafe.String
andunsafe.SliceData
can improve performance but may impact memory safety. Ensure that the function is tested thoroughly.The code changes are approved.
codec/address/bech32_codec.go (1)
118-118
: LGTM! But ensure thorough testing.The use of
unsafe.String
andunsafe.SliceData
can improve performance but may impact memory safety. Ensure that the method is tested thoroughly.The code changes are approved.
codec/address/bech32_codec_test.go (1)
Line range hint
143-148
: Verify the safety and correctness of usingunsafe.String
andunsafe.SliceData
.The new approach directly manipulates memory for conversion, which can improve performance but introduces potential risks related to memory safety. Ensure that the byte slices are not modified after the conversion and that the length is correctly calculated.
types/address.go (3)
Line range hint
289-295
: Verify the safety and correctness of usingunsafe.String
andunsafe.SliceData
.The new approach directly manipulates memory for conversion, which can improve performance but introduces potential risks related to memory safety. Ensure that the byte slices are not modified after the conversion and that the length is correctly calculated.
Line range hint
440-446
: Verify the safety and correctness of usingunsafe.String
andunsafe.SliceData
.The new approach directly manipulates memory for conversion, which can improve performance but introduces potential risks related to memory safety. Ensure that the byte slices are not modified after the conversion and that the length is correctly calculated.
Line range hint
587-593
: Verify the safety and correctness of usingunsafe.String
andunsafe.SliceData
.The new approach directly manipulates memory for conversion, which can improve performance but introduces potential risks related to memory safety. Ensure that the byte slices are not modified after the conversion and that the length is correctly calculated.
Hey, sorry if I wasn't clear, I didn't suggest that we to remove this helper, it is actually useful. |
e8e596f
to
f5305fb
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- store/internal/conv/string.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/internal/conv/string.go (1 hunks)
- x/authz/internal/conv/string.go (1 hunks)
- x/nft/internal/conv/string.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (4)
x/authz/internal/conv/string.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/internal/conv/string.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.store/v2/internal/conv/string.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.x/nft/internal/conv/string.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (8)
x/authz/internal/conv/string.go (2)
Line range hint
5-7
: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and the comment provides a necessary warning.
The code changes are approved.
13-16
: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and uses
unsafe.String
for a safer and more explicit conversion.The code changes are approved.
store/internal/conv/string.go (2)
Line range hint
7-9
: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and the comment provides a necessary warning.
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
13-18
: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and uses
unsafe.String
for a safer and more explicit conversion.The code changes are approved.
store/v2/internal/conv/string.go (2)
Line range hint
7-9
: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and the comment provides a necessary warning.
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
13-18
: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and uses
unsafe.String
for a safer and more explicit conversion.The code changes are approved.
x/nft/internal/conv/string.go (2)
Line range hint
6-8
: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and includes a useful warning comment.
The code changes are approved.
17-18
: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented using
unsafe.String
andunsafe.SliceData
, which enhances safety and clarity.The code changes are approved.
Done |
f5305fb
to
7d1df8a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- internal/conv/string.go (1 hunks)
- store/internal/conv/string.go (1 hunks)
- store/v2/internal/conv/string.go (1 hunks)
- x/authz/internal/conv/string.go (1 hunks)
- x/nft/internal/conv/string.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- CHANGELOG.md
- internal/conv/string.go
- store/internal/conv/string.go
- x/authz/internal/conv/string.go
- x/nft/internal/conv/string.go
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
store/v2/internal/conv/string.go (1)
Pattern
**/*.go
: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (2)
store/v2/internal/conv/string.go (2)
Line range hint
6-8
: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented, and the comment provides necessary warnings about potential segmentation faults.
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
12-18
: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented, and the comment provides necessary context about its intended use.
The code changes are approved.
Hello, Please Review this pr. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
(cherry picked from commit d56bbb8) # Conflicts: # store/internal/conv/string.go # store/v2/internal/conv/string.go
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit