Skip to content

AsyncAPI #1935

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 47 commits into from
Mar 16, 2021
Merged

AsyncAPI #1935

merged 47 commits into from
Mar 16, 2021

Conversation

miguelvr
Copy link
Collaborator

@miguelvr miguelvr commented Mar 4, 2021

closes #1610


checklist:

  • run make test and make lint
  • test manually (i.e. build/push all images, restart operator, and re-deploy APIs)
  • update examples
  • update docs and add any new files to summary.md (view in gitbook after merging)
  • cherry-pick into release branches if applicable
  • alert the dev team if the dev environment changed

@miguelvr miguelvr changed the title WIP: async-gateway workload creation service AsyncAPI Mar 5, 2021
@vishalbollu vishalbollu merged commit 57077ea into master Mar 16, 2021
@vishalbollu vishalbollu deleted the features/async branch March 16, 2021 01:10
@vishalbollu vishalbollu added this to the 0.31 milestone Mar 16, 2021
@lminer
Copy link

lminer commented Mar 17, 2021

This is great! A couple of questions. Can this be used with the TensorFlow predictor (i.e. will self.client.predict return a job id)? Will docs for this be released soon?

@vishalbollu
Copy link
Contributor

AsyncAPI is currently not compatible with Tensorflow predictor type in this release, only the Python predictor type is. However we are planning to iterate on AsyncAPI further and will keep you posted. Here are the docs for async.

@lminer
Copy link

lminer commented Mar 17, 2021

Thanks for the update @vishalbollu. Is there an issue for the Tensorflow predictor type that I could follow?

@vishalbollu
Copy link
Contributor

vishalbollu commented Mar 18, 2021

I just created one #1980. It will be updated accordingly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for AsyncAPI kind
4 participants