Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow passing a an optional conventional-changelog "preset" option #169

Closed
lancecaraccioli opened this issue Apr 13, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Comments

@lancecaraccioli
Copy link

Not all consumers of standard-version are on github, but would like to take advantage of the workflow provided by the standard-version project. Allowing consumers to pass a conventional-changelog preset option will give them the ability to create custom configurations that suit their needs e.g. conventional-changelog-upwork

lancecaraccioli pushed a commit to lancecaraccioli/standard-version that referenced this issue Apr 13, 2017
jbottigliero pushed a commit to jbottigliero/standard-version that referenced this issue Nov 21, 2018
jbottigliero pushed a commit to jbottigliero/standard-version that referenced this issue Nov 21, 2018
jbottigliero pushed a commit to jbottigliero/standard-version that referenced this issue Nov 22, 2018
jbottigliero pushed a commit to jbottigliero/standard-version that referenced this issue Nov 22, 2018
jbottigliero pushed a commit to jbottigliero/standard-version that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2019
jbottigliero pushed a commit to jbottigliero/standard-version that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2019
@Djiit
Copy link

Djiit commented Jun 27, 2019

The option --presetexists now, maybe we should close this one ?

@perfectlyimaginary
Copy link

#508

@jbottigliero
Copy link
Member

As previously mentioned the --preset option grants this functionality and supports additional presets found in the conventional-changelog ecosystem as well as custom presets. Thanks all!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants