Skip to content

Conversation

@scouten-adobe
Copy link
Collaborator

(Supports upcoming work I'm planning around configuring trust for reading CAWG identity assertions.)

…ather than a reference

(Supports upcoming work I'm planning around configuring trust for reading CAWG identity assertions.)
@scouten-adobe scouten-adobe self-assigned this Jul 16, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.07%. Comparing base (89bafcc) to head (de8574e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1238   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.07%   80.07%           
=======================================
  Files         151      151           
  Lines       43401    43401           
=======================================
  Hits        34752    34752           
  Misses       8649     8649           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Collaborator

@gpeacock gpeacock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks ok to me. Do we still need these to be public APIs?

@scouten-adobe scouten-adobe merged commit 60001a7 into main Aug 1, 2025
38 checks passed
@scouten-adobe scouten-adobe deleted the scouten/verifier-ctp-cow branch August 1, 2025 21:02
@caiopensrc caiopensrc mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2025
ok-nick pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2025
…ather than a reference (#1238)

(Supports upcoming work I'm planning around configuring trust for reading CAWG identity assertions.)
@caiopensrc caiopensrc mentioned this pull request Aug 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants