Skip to content

Conversation

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

Similar to yesterday's --ip. No changes to content, all I did
was variableize the instances of 'container'/'pod'.

Did not touch podman-network-connect file, but if someone
wants to look at that one and tell me whether all this long
text is applicable to it (or not), I'd appreciate it.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago santiago@redhat.com

more man-page deduplication

Similar to yesterday's --ip. No changes to content, all I did
was variableize the instances of 'container'/'pod'.

Did not touch podman-network-connect file, but if someone
wants to look at that one and tell me whether all this long
text is applicable to it (or not), I'd appreciate it.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
@edsantiago edsantiago added the kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. label Sep 14, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 14, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 14, 2022
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, we cannot use the same text for network connect since the --network option does not apply/exists for this command

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Sep 14, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 14, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit e1b3d98 into containers:main Sep 14, 2022
@edsantiago edsantiago deleted the docs_dedup_ip6 branch September 14, 2022 14:10
edsantiago added a commit to edsantiago/libpod that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2022
Three tests were running 'container rm' on 'start'ed containers
that might not yet have exited. Fix. Also, tighten up the
tests themselves, to make even more sure that they test
what they're supposed to test.

Discovered, in CI, that 'podman-remote logs --timestamps'
was unimplemented. Thanks to @Luap99 for the fix to that.

Fixes: containers#15783
Fixes: containers#15795

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 20, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants