Attempt to clarify error message for missing CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER #550
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
General-purpose desktop distributions are compiled with CONFIG_SECCOMP and CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER, but vendor kernels for phones and other assorted embedded devices don't necessarily enable these options. These kernels are unsuitable for running Flatpak, or anything else that relies on
bwrap --seccomp
orbwrap --add-seccomp-fd
.Missing CONFIG_SECCOMP or CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER is not the only reason why we could get EINVAL here: I think we'd also get EINVAL if the seccomp program is syntatically invalid. However, it's a relatively likely reason, so it seems worth providing a hint.
Helps: flatpak/flatpak#3069