Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow developers to use their own crypto schemes #50

Open
3 tasks
vqhuy opened this issue Aug 2, 2016 · 3 comments
Open
3 tasks

Allow developers to use their own crypto schemes #50

vqhuy opened this issue Aug 2, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@vqhuy
Copy link
Member

vqhuy commented Aug 2, 2016

As @arlolra commented in #48 (comment):

it might be worth abstracting this further into interfaces which the vrf/ and sign/ packages implement, so that using the PAD with other schemes is straightforward.

It also useful to allow the developers to supply theirs own

@masomel
Copy link
Member

masomel commented Aug 2, 2016

I think this is also part of #6.

@vqhuy
Copy link
Member Author

vqhuy commented Aug 2, 2016

Close since it is a part of #6

@vqhuy vqhuy closed this as completed Aug 2, 2016
@masomel
Copy link
Member

masomel commented Aug 2, 2016

So I think there are two parts to this issue, right? One is specifying the scheme in the policy, and the other is actually supplying the scheme to the data structure. I think this issue should remain open to address this second part specifically.

@vqhuy vqhuy reopened this Aug 2, 2016
@vqhuy vqhuy mentioned this issue Mar 2, 2017
6 tasks
@vqhuy vqhuy modified the milestone: Backlog Apr 12, 2017
vqhuy added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 20, 2017
…eir own hash function.

* Convert the default hash function to SHA-512/256

* Part of #50

Credit to KT's team
vqhuy added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 26, 2017
…eir own hash function.

* Convert the default hash function to SHA-512/256

* Part of #50

Credit to KT's team
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants