Skip to content

fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set/for statements #2139

fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set/for statements

fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set/for statements #2139

Triggered via issue October 26, 2024 22:02
@beckermrbeckermr
commented on #5514 810be76
Status Skipped
Total duration 2s
Artifacts

issues.yml

on: issue_comment
pending_support
0s
pending_support
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in