Skip to content

fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set/for statements #149

fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set/for statements

fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set/for statements #149

Triggered via issue October 26, 2024 11:51
@beckermrbeckermr
commented on #5514 810be76
Status Skipped
Total duration 3s
Artifacts

update.yml

on: issue_comment
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in