Skip to content

fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set/for statements #133

fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set/for statements

fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set/for statements #133

Triggered via issue October 23, 2024 16:34
Status Skipped
Total duration 2s
Artifacts

update.yml

on: issue_comment
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in