Skip to content

Conversation

stain
Copy link
Member

@stain stain commented May 24, 2018

Description

Display link to the workflow's declared license. If none is declared, check for LICENSE or LICENSE.txt.

Motivation and Context

As pointed out in #183 we don't render the license. From #180 this uses schema:license with a fallback to doap:license and dcterms:license, assuming it is a URI.

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested with workflows:

Screenshots (if appropriate):

In same order:

opensource

other-license-uri

unknown-license

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

stain added 6 commits May 24, 2018 23:44
.. and some constructors
For now the mapping to human-readable names done straight in template..
.. assuming spammers don't use screen readers?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant