Skip to content

docs: update CONTRIBUTING-PYTHON.md #247

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
John-peterson-coinbase merged 1 commit into from
Feb 3, 2025
Merged

docs: update CONTRIBUTING-PYTHON.md #247

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion CONTRIBUTING-PYTHON.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ Do not use the contract address as the destination address. If you are unsure of
"""
```

* The prompt disambuguates the type of NFT by specifying "ERC-721"
* The prompt disambiguates the type of NFT by specifying "ERC-721"
* The prompt specifies that the destination address should not be the contract address
* The prompt specifies that the LLM should ask the user for the destination address if it is unsure
* Think about the best UX: if a contract address from a known list of addresses is required, you can instruct the LLM to use another action to get the list of addresses and prompt the user to choose an address from that list. For example, consider a DeFi action that allows a user to withdraw funds from a liquidity provider position. This action would take a contract address, so it would be valuable to have another action that can pull a list of addresses representing the user's positions. You can then instruct the LLM via the prompt to use that action in the case that no contract address is provided.
Expand Down