Skip to content

Conversation

@NiallJoeMaher
Copy link
Contributor

Broken profile page currently caused by banned users relation
This updates the check for banned user and cleans up the profile page to no longer use tabs

@NiallJoeMaher NiallJoeMaher requested a review from a team as a code owner October 12, 2024 10:33
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 12, 2024

@NiallJoeMaher is attempting to deploy a commit to the Codú Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the Profile component in _usernameClient.tsx, updates to user profile handling in page.tsx, and a minor style adjustment in the Tabs component. The Profile component now utilizes the Heading component for rendering and simplifies tab handling. The page.tsx file enhances user profile retrieval by querying the banned_users table directly, affecting how account status is determined. The Tabs component's background color in dark mode has been adjusted, but no structural changes were made.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/(app)/[username]/_usernameClient.tsx - Replaced Tabs component with Heading component.
- Simplified selectedTab logic.
- Updated rendering of account locked message.
- Removed GROUPS case from switch statement.
- Added method getDomainFromUrl(url: string).
app/(app)/[username]/page.tsx - Changed user profile retrieval logic to query banned_users directly.
- Removed cleaning of profile data.
- Added accountLocked property to shapedProfile.
components/Tabs/index.tsx - Modified className of <select> from dark:bg-neutral-900 to dark:bg-neutral-950.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Profile
    participant Database
    participant Tabs

    User->>Profile: Request Profile
    Profile->>Database: Query banned_users
    Database-->>Profile: Return banned status
    Profile->>Tabs: Render with Heading component
    Tabs-->>User: Display articles
Loading

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where changes bloom,
The Profile shines, dispelling gloom.
With Heading bright, and tabs now light,
Banned users checked, all feels just right!
Hopping along, we celebrate,
New features here, oh, what a fate! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 12, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
codu ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 12, 2024 10:36am

@NiallJoeMaher NiallJoeMaher merged commit d45d070 into codu-code:develop Oct 12, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
components/Tabs/index.tsx (1)

32-32: LGTM! Consider updating desktop view for consistency.

The change to a darker background (dark:bg-neutral-950) for the select element in dark mode is appropriate and aligns with the PR objective of cleaning up the profile page layout. This modification enhances the visual contrast in dark mode, potentially improving readability.

For consistency, consider applying a similar background color change to the desktop view of the tabs (if applicable). This would ensure a uniform appearance across different screen sizes.

app/(app)/[username]/_usernameClient.tsx (2)

115-116: LGTM: Simplified articles section with article count

The replacement of the Tabs component with a simple Heading that includes the article count is a good simplification. It provides clear information to the user about the content they're viewing.

Consider adding a conditional rendering to handle the case when there are no articles:

<Heading level={1}>
  {posts.length > 0 ? `Articles (${posts.length})` : 'No articles yet'}
</Heading>

This would provide a more informative message when the user has no articles.


Line range hint 30-214: Consider further component decomposition for improved maintainability

The changes have simplified the UI while maintaining core functionality. However, the Profile component is still quite large and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused components:

  1. UserInfo: Handle rendering of user details (name, username, bio, website).
  2. ArticleList: Manage the rendering of article previews.
  3. AdminControls: Encapsulate the admin-specific functionality.

This decomposition would improve readability and maintainability of the code. For example:

const Profile = ({ profile, isOwner, session }: Props) => {
  // ... existing logic ...

  return (
    <>
      <UserInfo profile={profile} />
      {accountLocked ? (
        <Heading level={1}>Account locked 🔒</Heading>
      ) : (
        <ArticleList posts={posts} isOwner={isOwner} />
      )}
      {session?.user?.role === "ADMIN" && (
        <AdminControls profile={profile} onBan={handleBanSubmit} onUnban={() => unbanUser({ userId: id })} />
      )}
    </>
  );
};

This structure would make the main Profile component more concise and easier to understand at a glance.

app/(app)/[username]/page.tsx (2)

Line range hint 100-104: Prevent exposure of user data when account is locked

Currently, even if accountLocked is true, the shapedProfile includes all properties from ...profile, potentially exposing personal information of a banned user. To protect user privacy, consider excluding the profile data when the account is locked.

You can modify the code as follows to ensure sensitive data is not exposed:

 const shapedProfile = {
   accountLocked,
   posts: [],
-  ...profile,
+  ...(accountLocked ? {} : { ...profile }),
 };

This change ensures that when an account is locked, shapedProfile contains only the accountLocked flag and an empty posts array.


Line range hint 100-104: Simplify posts assignment when account is not locked

In the posts assignment, the mapping over profile.posts reassigns published to post.published without any transformation. If no changes are made to the post objects, you can directly assign profile.posts to posts.

Here's the simplified code:

 const shapedProfile = {
   ...(accountLocked ? {} : { ...profile }),
   posts: accountLocked ? [] : profile.posts,
   accountLocked,
 };

This removes unnecessary mapping and improves code readability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 126ddf5 and c5aa11a.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • app/(app)/[username]/_usernameClient.tsx (3 hunks)
  • app/(app)/[username]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
  • components/Tabs/index.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
app/(app)/[username]/_usernameClient.tsx (3)

11-11: LGTM: Import change aligns with PR objectives

The replacement of the Tabs import with Heading is consistent with the PR's goal of removing tabs from the profile page layout. This change simplifies the component and potentially improves the user interface.


112-112: LGTM: Improved semantic structure for locked account message

The use of the Heading component for the account locked message improves the semantic structure of the component. This change is consistent with modern React practices and maintains the visual cue with the lock emoji.


74-75: Simplified tab logic: Clarification needed

The simplification of tab handling logic aligns with the PR objective of cleaning up the profile page layout. However, could you please clarify if the removal of other potential tabs (like GROUPS) impacts any important functionality? If not, this change is a good simplification.

To ensure no functionality is lost, let's check for any references to removed tabs:

✅ Verification successful

Tab Handling Logic Verified

The removal of other tabs does not impact any existing functionality based on the current codebase references. The simplification to use only the ARTICLES tab aligns with the PR's objective to streamline the profile page layout.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to 'GROUPS' tab or other tab-related logic
rg --type typescript --type tsx 'GROUPS|selectedTab|tabs\s*=' app/

Length of output: 103


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to 'GROUPS' tab or other tab-related logic
rg --type ts --type tsx 'GROUPS|selectedTab|tabs\s*=' app/

Length of output: 88


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to 'GROUPS' tab or other tab-related logic
rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' 'GROUPS|selectedTab|tabs\s*=' app/

Length of output: 1351

app/(app)/[username]/page.tsx (3)

91-93: Correctly checking for banned users

The code appropriately queries the banned_users table to determine if the user is banned by matching the userId with profile.id.


95-95: Proper boolean conversion for accountLocked

Using !!bannedUser effectively converts the result to a boolean, which is suitable for the accountLocked flag.


97-97: Ensure accurate owner identification

The check session?.user?.id === profile.id correctly determines if the current session belongs to the profile owner.

@NiallJoeMaher NiallJoeMaher deleted the bugfix/banned-users-breaking-profile branch October 12, 2024 10:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant