You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello there! I'm a new Cloud Commander user and discovered the project while looking for file managers to use with my personal server.
I noticed that rclone has already been recommended here in 2018 (#204), and that fully integrating rclone may not be feasible.
I think a good alternative would be to support FTP similar to the current Dropbox implementation. This would, in practice, enable support for all backends/protocols supported by rclone, since it can serve any of its remotes over FTP.
Hope this is worth taking a look at,
A grateful new user.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
piratetub
changed the title
Support FTP similar to how Dropbox support has been implemented.
Add Support for FTP (similar to the Dropbox support)
Jan 28, 2020
That's amazing idea for a pull request :), something like qusly this can be used for this purpose. Could you please tell me, are you talking about full dropbox support which is enabled with --dropbox flag, and intend using dropbox only support on both panels?
I see!
Even if simultaneous access is not currently possible, the FTP addition to the Dropbox scheme would still be a great addition. I can imagine spinning up 2 instances of cloudcmd for access to both local and remote files being a reasonable compromise.. :)
cloudcmd -v
): v14.2.1node -v
: v12.14.1uname -a
on Linux): N/AHello there! I'm a new Cloud Commander user and discovered the project while looking for file managers to use with my personal server.
I noticed that rclone has already been recommended here in 2018 (#204), and that fully integrating rclone may not be feasible.
I think a good alternative would be to support FTP similar to the current Dropbox implementation. This would, in practice, enable support for all backends/protocols supported by rclone, since it can serve any of its remotes over FTP.
Hope this is worth taking a look at,
A grateful new user.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: