⚡️ Speed up method BookStackDataSource.get_content_permissions by 13%
#264
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 13% (0.13x) speedup for
BookStackDataSource.get_content_permissionsinbackend/python/app/sources/external/bookstack/bookstack.py⏱️ Runtime :
1.92 milliseconds→1.69 milliseconds(best of283runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization achieves a 13% runtime improvement through two key micro-optimizations in the
get_content_permissionsmethod:1. String Formatting Optimization
url = self.base_url + "/api/content-permissions/{content_type}/{content_id}".format(content_type=content_type, content_id=content_id)url = f"{self.base_url}/api/content-permissions/{content_type}/{content_id}"The f-string approach eliminates the overhead of
.format()method calls and dictionary lookups for variable substitution. Line profiler shows this reduced execution time from 428,354ns to 218,124ns (49% improvement on this line).2. Header Copy Elimination
headers = dict(self.http.headers)headers = self.http.headersSince headers are only read (not mutated) within the request, the unnecessary dict copy is removed. This reduces execution time from 188,413ns to 127,697ns (32% improvement on this line).
Performance Impact: These optimizations are particularly effective for high-frequency API calls, as evidenced by the test cases with concurrent requests (10-100 operations). The 13% runtime improvement comes from eliminating repetitive overhead in two of the most frequently executed lines during request construction.
Test Case Effectiveness: The optimizations show consistent benefits across all test scenarios, from basic single calls to throughput tests with 100 concurrent requests, making this especially valuable for applications making frequent BookStack API calls.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-BookStackDataSource.get_content_permissions-mhbogym8and push.