⚡️ Speed up function capture_code_cell by 6%
          #45
        
          
      
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
📄 6% (0.06x) speedup for
capture_code_cellinpanel/io/handlers.py⏱️ Runtime :
1.97 milliseconds→1.86 milliseconds(best of55runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 6% speedup through three key optimizations that reduce redundant string operations:
1. Conditional String Replacements
The original code performed
replace()operations on every source line, even when the target strings weren't present. The optimization adds a conditional check (if 'get_ipython().run_line_magic' in line or 'get_ipython().magic' in line:) before performing replacements. This eliminates unnecessary string operations on the majority of lines that don't contain magic commands.2. Cached String Stripping
The original code called
cell_out.strip()multiple times - once in the parsing loop condition and again when checking for semicolons. The optimization caches this result incell_out_stripand reuses it, eliminating redundantstrip()calls.3. Simplified String Concatenation
The original code used a multi-line triple-quoted f-string for the output capture code, which creates multiple string objects. The optimization replaces this with direct f-string concatenation, reducing memory allocations during string construction.
Performance Impact by Test Case:
The optimizations are most effective for large cells with many non-magic lines, where the conditional replacement check provides the biggest benefit by avoiding thousands of unnecessary string operations.
✅ Correctness verification report:
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
io/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_cell_expressionio/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_cell_expression_semicolonio/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_cell_expression_with_commentio/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_cell_functionio/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_cell_loopio/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_cell_multi_line_expressionio/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_cell_statementio/test_handlers.py::test_capture_code_expression_multi_line_with_comment🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-capture_code_cell-mhbm4s9nand push.