Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Oct 29, 2025

📄 1,129% (11.29x) speedup for Categorical.equals in pandas/core/arrays/categorical.py

⏱️ Runtime : 155 microseconds 12.6 microseconds (best of 17 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimized code achieves a 12x speedup by eliminating expensive hash computations and avoiding unnecessary object allocations in the equals method.

Key optimizations:

  1. Early reference equality check: Added if self is other: return True to immediately return for identical objects - a common case in pandas workflows where the same Categorical is compared to itself.

  2. Avoided expensive hash computation: The original code called hash(self.dtype) == hash(other.dtype) which is computationally expensive. The optimized version:

    • First checks if dtype objects are identical (self_dtype is other_dtype)
    • Then directly compares .ordered fields and uses Index.equals() for categories comparison
    • Only falls back to hash comparison as a last resort
  3. Inlined recoding logic: Instead of calling self._encode_with_my_categories(other) which creates a temporary Categorical object, the optimized version directly calls recode_for_categories() and compares codes, eliminating object allocation overhead.

  4. Optimized _categories_match_up_to_permutation: Similarly avoids hash computation by doing direct field comparisons first.

Performance characteristics: These optimizations are particularly effective for:

  • Cases where categoricals have identical dtypes (common in pandas operations)
  • Self-comparisons (cat.equals(cat))
  • Comparisons between categoricals with the same category structure

The line profiler shows the original hash() call took 196ms (100% of time), while the optimized version's field comparisons take only 27ms (70% of total time), with the overall method running 12x faster.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 78 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 66.7%
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
arrays/categorical/test_operators.py::TestCategoricalOps.test_compare_unordered_different_order 154μs 12.6μs 1129%✅

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-Categorical.equals-mhby1z89 and push.

Codeflash

The optimized code achieves a **12x speedup** by eliminating expensive hash computations and avoiding unnecessary object allocations in the `equals` method.

**Key optimizations:**

1. **Early reference equality check**: Added `if self is other: return True` to immediately return for identical objects - a common case in pandas workflows where the same Categorical is compared to itself.

2. **Avoided expensive hash computation**: The original code called `hash(self.dtype) == hash(other.dtype)` which is computationally expensive. The optimized version:
   - First checks if dtype objects are identical (`self_dtype is other_dtype`) 
   - Then directly compares `.ordered` fields and uses `Index.equals()` for categories comparison
   - Only falls back to hash comparison as a last resort

3. **Inlined recoding logic**: Instead of calling `self._encode_with_my_categories(other)` which creates a temporary Categorical object, the optimized version directly calls `recode_for_categories()` and compares codes, eliminating object allocation overhead.

4. **Optimized `_categories_match_up_to_permutation`**: Similarly avoids hash computation by doing direct field comparisons first.

**Performance characteristics**: These optimizations are particularly effective for:
- Cases where categoricals have identical dtypes (common in pandas operations)
- Self-comparisons (`cat.equals(cat)`)
- Comparisons between categoricals with the same category structure

The line profiler shows the original `hash()` call took 196ms (100% of time), while the optimized version's field comparisons take only 27ms (70% of total time), with the overall method running **12x faster**.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from mashraf-222 October 29, 2025 12:00
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Oct 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant