Skip to content

Conversation

@wfleming
Copy link
Contributor

@wfleming wfleming commented Mar 3, 2016

  • 512MB is a strongly recommended limit for Docker image size, but isn't strictly enforced, and isn't always feasible. The previous 256MB was too low. I've updated the limit, and changed "must" to "should".
  • Our default memory limit is also higher now, but is a strict limit. I've updated the memory limit.
  • Fix some typos.

cc @mrb @codeclimate/review

@pbrisbin
Copy link
Contributor

pbrisbin commented Mar 3, 2016

I think we should keep the must language on the size limit. Even though we may not strictly enforce it today, my understanding is we very much intend to. I'd rather just keep the stronger language now than have to change it to be stronger later.

* 512MB is a strongly recommended limit for Docker image size, but isn't strictly enforced, and isn't always feasible. The previous 256MB was too low. I've updated the limit, and changed "must" to "should".
* Our default memory limit is also higher now, but is a strict limit. I've updated the memory limit.
* Fix some typos.

cc @mrb @codeclimate/review
@wfleming wfleming force-pushed the wf-resource-rewording branch from 3f9d32f to d172985 Compare March 3, 2016 22:42
@wfleming
Copy link
Contributor Author

wfleming commented Mar 3, 2016

@pbrisbin switched back to "must".

@pbrisbin
Copy link
Contributor

pbrisbin commented Mar 3, 2016

LGTM, though we probably want an @mrb or @brynary sign-off before merging.

mrb added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2016
@mrb mrb merged commit 8bb17af into master Mar 4, 2016
@dblandin dblandin deleted the wf-resource-rewording branch March 15, 2017 15:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants