Skip to content

Comments

[pull] master from supabase:master#643

Merged
pull[bot] merged 9 commits intocode:masterfrom
supabase:master
Feb 3, 2026
Merged

[pull] master from supabase:master#643
pull[bot] merged 9 commits intocode:masterfrom
supabase:master

Conversation

@pull
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Feb 3, 2026

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

dshukertjr and others added 9 commits February 3, 2026 12:18
…42384)

## I have read the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
file.

YES

## What kind of change does this PR introduce?

`create-react-app` is deprecated, so this PR brings vite before
`create-react-app` when opening React in the connect dialog.
## Context

Related to unifying read replicas into the database replication page

Updates some copywriting on the database replication page if the feature
flag is on

## Before
<img width="768" height="104" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2f49d5b7-5141-4606-b50c-886a6b62f80e"
/>

<img width="1109" height="209" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d1c37f8f-2105-49ad-a029-e5d00a81050a"
/>


## After 
<img width="899" height="89" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ffcbd1de-56ea-4181-937c-29b96c25d7d0"
/>

<img width="1094" height="206" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9942134c-8bf1-4978-a343-93df4397d044"
/>


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Replication interface now displays contextual guidance and
descriptions based on your configuration.
* Enhanced messaging for data synchronization and destination
management.

* **UI Improvements**
* Refined layout spacing in the destinations empty state for improved
visual clarity.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Context

Just adding some documentation to the more complex parts of the
dashboard in hopes to ease working on these parts for those who aren't
familiar

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Bug Fixes**
* Folder creation and updates in the SQL Editor now properly sync to the
backend with API calls, success notifications, and improved error
handling.
* Snippet save/upsert behavior updated: saves run via API with
optimistic handling and debounced execution; default automatic refresh
after save has been reduced to avoid unnecessary invalidations.

* **Documentation**
* Added a comprehensive SQL Editor guide covering UI, data flow, snippet
management, and improvement notes.

<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review
settings.</sub>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
…lue (#42382)

## Context

Addresses a small footgun where copying and paste a single value with
new lines and hitting save in the edge function secrets page will also
save the new lines in the secret name.

Fix is just adding a trim

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Chores**
* Internal code organization and refactoring improvements to enhance
codebase maintainability and consistency across the Functions module.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
… state handling (#42378)

## Context

Related to unifying read replicas into database replication page which
is currently in internal testing

## Changes involved

- Updates the "New replica" CTA in `DatabaseSelector` (e.g within the
SQL Editor) to link to the replication page instead of settings
infrastructure
- Refactor replication UI to use URL query states for new destination +
edit destination

## To test

- [ ] Verify that the "New replica" CTA links correctly to replication
page if flag is on
- [ ] Verify that new + edit destination UI works as expected
- Note that there's some server side validation for ETL replication now
so might be tricky to test creating an actual ETL replication
- Minimally can test creating a read replica and ensure that the UI
behaviour is all as expected

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Added unified replication experience with URL-based state management
for destination creation and editing

* **Refactor**
* Simplified replication panel component interfaces and consolidated
destination data fetching logic
* Enhanced edit flows to leverage URL parameters for seamless navigation

* **Chores**
  * Marked legacy read replica creation panel as deprecated
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Summary

Adds exposure tracking for the HomeV2 experiment and the Getting Started
section. These events help measure user engagement with the new home
page experience and track how many users see the Getting Started
onboarding flow.

Resolves
[GROWTH-602](https://linear.app/supabase/issue/GROWTH-602/track-home-page-and-getting-started-exposure-events)

## Changes

- Add `home_new_experiment_exposed` event that fires when users see the
HomeV2 experiment (captures which variant they're assigned)
- Add `home_getting_started_section_exposed` event that fires when the
Getting Started section is displayed (captures current workflow state)
- Define corresponding TypeScript interfaces in telemetry-constants.ts
- Both events use `useRef` to ensure they only fire once per component
mount

## Testing

Tested locally and on staging that events fire to posthog.

**Quick test:**
1. Navigate to a project home page with the `homeNew` flag enabled
2. Verify `home_new_experiment_exposed` event fires in PostHog with the
correct variant
3. For projects < 10 days old, verify
`home_getting_started_section_exposed` fires when the section is visible
4. Confirm events don't fire for dismissed sections or mature projects

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Added exposure tracking for home experiment variants and the Getting
Started section to surface which experience users see.

* **Chores**
* Standardized and consolidated analytics calls to improve reliability
of interaction tracking.
* Enhanced event payloads to capture workflow choices, step
interactions, and dismissals for better product insights.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Context

Part of an investigation to see how we can make the dashboard more
resilient for large databases by ensuring that the dashboard never
becomes the reason for taking down the database accidentally.

Am proposing that for interfaces that rely heavily on queries to the
database for data to render, we add preflight checks to ensure that we
never run queries that exceed a certain cost threshold (and also have UI
handlers to communicate this) - this can be done by running an EXPLAIN
query before running the actual query, and if the cost from the EXPLAIN
exceeds a specified threshold, the UI throws an error then and skips
calling the actual query.

## Demo
Am piloting this with the Table Editor, and got an example here in which
my table has 500K+ rows, and I'm trying to sort on an unindexed column:


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ccad2ea9-d62c-4106-8295-2a6df5941474

With this UX, the pros are that
- It's relatively seamless and not too invasive, most users won't notice
this unless they run into this specific scenario
- We can incrementally apply this to other parts of the dashboard, next
will probably be Auth Users for example

However there are some considerations:
- The additional EXPLAIN query adds a bit more latency to the query
since its a separate API request to the query endpoint
- ^ On a similar note, it will hammer the API a bit more, which may
result in higher probability of 429s
- However, I reckon that the preflight checks are meant to be used
sparingly and only for certain parts of the dashboard that we believe
may cause high load.
- e.g for the Table Editor, reckon we only need this for fetching rows?
The count query is largely optimized already (although we could just add
a preflight check there too)
- It's just meant to be a safeguard to prevent running heavy queries on
the database



<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **New Features**
* Query preflight with cost checks and a user-facing high-cost dialog
showing cost details and remediation suggestions.
* Grid exposes an explicit error flag and surfaces richer error
metadata.

* **Bug Fixes**
* Standardized error handling and more consistent error displays across
the app.
* Explain analysis now reports an additional max-cost metric for
queries.

* **UI**
* Tweaked empty-state interaction/layout and slightly wider header
delete control.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Ali Waseem <waseema393@gmail.com>
@pull pull bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 3, 2026
@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Feb 3, 2026
@pull pull bot merged commit f0fbcbd into code:master Feb 3, 2026
1 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants