Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

function claimYieldFeeShares subtracts wrongly #79

Closed
c4-bot-4 opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

function claimYieldFeeShares subtracts wrongly #79

c4-bot-4 opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly bug Something isn't working duplicate-59 🤖_10_group AI based duplicate group recommendation satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards sufficient quality report This report is of sufficient quality upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge

Comments

@c4-bot-4
Copy link
Contributor

c4-bot-4 commented Mar 8, 2024

Lines of code

https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-pooltogether/blob/main/pt-v5-vault/src/PrizeVault.sol#L611

Vulnerability details

Impact

function claimYieldFeeShares subtracts the whole yieldFeeBalance instead of the shares that the YieldFeeRecipient provides.

Proof of Concept

The provided functions takes as a parameter shares that will be minted to the YieldFeeRecipient. The problem is there that no matter what the shares user provides the whole yieldBalance will get to 0 instead of subtracting shares;

    function claimYieldFeeShares(uint256 _shares) external onlyYieldFeeRecipient {
        if (_shares == 0) revert MintZeroShares();

        uint256 _yieldFeeBalance = yieldFeeBalance;
        if (_shares > _yieldFeeBalance) revert SharesExceedsYieldFeeBalance(_shares, _yieldFeeBalance);

        yieldFeeBalance -= _yieldFeeBalance; //@audit this has to be -= shares

        _mint(msg.sender, _shares);

        emit ClaimYieldFeeShares(msg.sender, _shares);
    }

Tools Used

Foundry

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Change PrizeVault:L617 to yieldFeeBalance -= _shares;

Assessed type

Math

@c4-bot-4 c4-bot-4 added 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working labels Mar 8, 2024
c4-bot-4 added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 8, 2024
@c4-bot-12 c4-bot-12 added the 🤖_10_group AI based duplicate group recommendation label Mar 11, 2024
@c4-pre-sort c4-pre-sort added the sufficient quality report This report is of sufficient quality label Mar 11, 2024
@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

raymondfam marked the issue as sufficient quality report

@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

raymondfam marked the issue as duplicate of #10

@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

raymondfam marked the issue as duplicate of #59

@c4-judge c4-judge added 3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge and removed 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value labels Mar 15, 2024
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

hansfriese changed the severity to 3 (High Risk)

@c4-judge c4-judge added the satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards label Mar 15, 2024
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

hansfriese marked the issue as satisfactory

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly bug Something isn't working duplicate-59 🤖_10_group AI based duplicate group recommendation satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards sufficient quality report This report is of sufficient quality upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants