Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QA Report #209

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Sep 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

QA Report #209

code423n4 opened this issue Sep 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working low quality report This report is of especially low quality QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.

@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax labels Sep 19, 2022
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 19, 2022
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 19, 2022
@0xble
Copy link
Collaborator

0xble commented Sep 26, 2022

We will implement "Use abstract for base contracts"

@0xble 0xble added low quality report This report is of especially low quality sponsor acknowledged Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity") and removed sponsor acknowledged Technically the issue is correct, but we're not going to resolve it for XYZ reasons labels Sep 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working low quality report This report is of especially low quality QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax sponsor confirmed Sponsor agrees this is a problem and intends to fix it (OK to use w/ "disagree with severity")
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants