Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gas Optimizations #230

Open
code423n4 opened this issue Jun 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Gas Optimizations #230

code423n4 opened this issue Jun 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

  1. Use Custom Error instead of Revert String to Save Gas

Custom error from solidity 0.8.4 are cheaper than revert strings, custom error are defined using the error statement can use inside and outside the contract.

source https://blog.soliditylang.org/2021/04/21/custom-errors/

i suggest replacing revert error strings with custom error

POC :

https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-notional-coop/blob/main/notional-wrapped-fcash/contracts/wfCashLogic.sol#L57
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-notional-coop/blob/main/notional-wrapped-fcash/contracts/wfCashLogic.sol#L122
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-notional-coop/blob/main/notional-wrapped-fcash/contracts/wfCashLogic.sol#L211
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-notional-coop/blob/main/notional-wrapped-fcash/contracts/wfCashLogic.sol#L225
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-notional-coop/blob/main/notional-wrapped-fcash/contracts/wfCashBase.sol#L37
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-notional-coop/blob/main/notional-wrapped-fcash/contracts/wfCashBase.sol#L42
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-notional-coop/blob/main/notional-wrapped-fcash/contracts/wfCashERC4626.sol#L23

  1. > 0 is less efficient than != 0 for unsigned integers

!= 0 costs less gas compared to > 0 for unsigned integers in require statements with the optimizer enabled (6 gas)

While it may seem that > 0 is cheaper than !=, this is only true without the optimizer enabled and outside a require statement. If you enable the optimizer at 10k AND you’re in a require statement, this will save gas.

source : https://twitter.com/gzeon/status/1485428085885640706

I suggest changing > 0 with != 0

POC :

https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-06-notional-coop/blob/main/notional-wrapped-fcash/contracts/wfCashERC4626.sol#L23

@code423n4 code423n4 added bug Something isn't working G (Gas Optimization) labels Jun 14, 2022
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants