Skip to content

Conversation

@heliocodacy
Copy link

No description provided.

@heliocodacy heliocodacy enabled auto-merge November 6, 2025 15:24
@codacy-production
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Nov 6, 2025

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00% (target: -100.00%) 0.00% (target: 0.00%)
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (ebe64ce) 30 25 83.33%
Head commit (ba21077) 30 (+0) 25 (+0) 83.33% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#13) 1 0 0.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

@heliocodacy heliocodacy added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 6, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Nov 6, 2025
@heliocodacy heliocodacy added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 6, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Nov 6, 2025
@heliocodacy heliocodacy added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 13, 2025
@DMarinhoCodacy DMarinhoCodacy removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Nov 13, 2025
person = Person()
print('User Abbas has been added with id ', person.set_name('Abbas'))
print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
slack_token = "xoxb-123456789012-1234567890123-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwx"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

person = Person()
print('User Abbas has been added with id ', person.set_name('Abbas'))
print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
slack_token = "xoxb-123456789012-1234567890123-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwx"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@claudia-codacy claudia-codacy added the codacy-review Trigger Codacy's AI reviewer label Dec 5, 2025
@codacy-production
Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Codacy's Analysis Summary

3 new issues (≤ 0 medium issue)
3 new security issues (≤ 0 issue)
0 complexity (≤ 20 gate)
0 duplications (≤ 1 gate)

Review Pull Request in Codacy →

AI Reviewer available: add the codacy-review label to get contextual insights without leaving GitHub.

Copy link

@codacy-production codacy-production bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This Pull Request introduces a severe security vulnerability by hardcoding a Slack token. Codacy has flagged this issue with multiple high-severity warnings. This PR is currently not up to security standards and should not be merged as is. The hardcoded secret must be removed immediately.

About this PR

  • The PR title 'DO NOT MERGE! add slack token just for kicks' indicates this is intentional, but committing hardcoded secrets, even temporarily or for demonstration, is a severe security risk. This token should never be present in source control, even in a non-production branch or a PR explicitly marked as 'DO NOT MERGE'.

💡 Codacy uses AI. Check for mistakes.

person = Person()
print('User Abbas has been added with id ', person.set_name('Abbas'))
print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
slack_token = "xoxb-123456789012-1234567890123-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwx"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔴 HIGH RISK

Codacy has detected multiple hardcoded secrets. This line exposes a Slack token, which is a critical security vulnerability. Sensitive information like API tokens should always be stored securely, for example, using environment variables or a secret management service, and never committed to version control.

This might be a simple fix:

Suggested change
slack_token = "xoxb-123456789012-1234567890123-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwx"

See Issue in Codacy
See Issue in Codacy
See Issue in Codacy

@heliocodacy heliocodacy removed the codacy-review Trigger Codacy's AI reviewer label Dec 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants