Skip to content

Show cask version of webapp as eventual replacement for play #843

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 48 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kwalcock
Copy link
Member

The play version is significant overkill for a webapp with next to no state. Because of recent significant changes to play, the webapp was only working for one Scala version, and it requires a completely different project structure and deployment mechanism. The cask version is intended to streamline and simplify the project.

@kwalcock
Copy link
Member Author

This is being pushed to github as a backup and made into a PR to document what I had been working on. This was built on top of the processors2 branch and that is largely the reason for the extra long history. It could be modified to be an independent branch. I'm not intending to merge it until it's clear that there will be someone around to maintain it.

@MihaiSurdeanu
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @kwalcock !
I'm interested in learning about cask myself.

@kwalcock
Copy link
Member Author

It's still of concern that neither cask nor http4s have reached version 1. This update makes use of scalatags which is very much more handy than string manipulation to generate html. We also lose Java 8 at runtime with cask, but just for the webapp.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants