Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Workers] Add Notes about Type Expections about Worker's Socket API #9118

Merged

Conversation

xiaokangwang
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, the documentation about Worker's Stream API do not mention that the write() may accept fewer kinds of type than any and however, it will throw an exception if the type is unexpected. This exception is more likely to be ignored in websocket's event handler since it is not an asynchronize function.

(See also: cloudflare/workerd#688)

@KimJ15 KimJ15 added the product:workers Related to Workers product label Jun 21, 2023
@deadlypants1973 deadlypants1973 changed the title Add Notes about Type Expections about Worker's Socket API [Workers] Add Notes about Type Expections about Worker's Socket API Jul 14, 2023
@kflansburg kflansburg requested a review from jasnell July 14, 2023 16:47
@KimJ15
Copy link
Collaborator

KimJ15 commented Sep 28, 2023

@jasnell can you review this PR so we can merge it? Thanks.

@irvinebroque
Copy link
Contributor

Do we need to document this in https://sockets-api.proposal.wintercg.org/ ? @dom96 @jasnell

@dom96
Copy link
Contributor

dom96 commented Oct 10, 2023

Do we need to document this in https://sockets-api.proposal.wintercg.org/ ? @dom96 @jasnell

I think so. I created an issue for this. wintercg/proposal-sockets-api#22

Co-authored-by: Dominik Picheta <dominikpicheta@googlemail.com>
@irvinebroque irvinebroque merged commit 4d7a8a1 into cloudflare:production Oct 11, 2023
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
product:workers Related to Workers product size/xs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants