Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Syntax fixes #506

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 14, 2019
Merged

Syntax fixes #506

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 14, 2019

Conversation

duglin
Copy link
Collaborator

@duglin duglin commented Sep 12, 2019

Evan noticed we have more than one #data header so I tried to fix that.

Also, we still used a complex/map in an example.

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis dug@us.ibm.com

Evan noticed we have more than one #data header so I tried to fix that.

Also, we still used a complex/map in an example.

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
@duglin duglin added the v1.0 label Sep 12, 2019
@duglin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

duglin commented Sep 12, 2019

Perhaps we can approve this one off-line, if people review and LGTM it?

Copy link

@Vlaaaaaaad Vlaaaaaaad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but should it maybe be "comexampleextension2-otherValue" : 5? I can't remember what we decided to do with nested extensions.

Renamed an example extension per Vlad's suggestion.

Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
@duglin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

duglin commented Sep 12, 2019

While looking for the text that describes what valid chars for attribute names, I found it near the terminology section - which seemed really odd. So I moved it into the "Context Attributes" section, so it'll be easier to find.

I also renamed the 2nd extension example per Vlad's suggestion - just to have a bit of variety.

Copy link

@Vlaaaaaaad Vlaaaaaaad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@duglin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

duglin commented Sep 14, 2019

Conditionally approved on the 9/12 call. No objections since then, so merging.

@duglin duglin merged commit 0e37e0e into cloudevents:master Sep 14, 2019
@duglin duglin deleted the fixes branch September 14, 2019 16:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants