Skip to content

Conversation

@joshua-spacetime
Copy link
Collaborator

Description of Changes

There's no reason to compress the table updates within an initial subscription, because it is only being sent to a single client. The outer message will always be compressed.

API and ABI breaking changes

None

Expected complexity level and risk

1

Testing

  • Regression test

Copy link
Contributor

@kazimuth kazimuth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks sensible. I'm satisfied that no code calling into this needs to be changed either. 👍

@joshua-spacetime joshua-spacetime added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 23, 2025
@joshua-spacetime joshua-spacetime linked an issue Apr 23, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Merged via the queue into master with commit 7a6d59c Apr 24, 2025
20 checks passed
@joshua-spacetime joshua-spacetime deleted the joshua/perf/no-double-compress-subscriptions branch April 24, 2025 00:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Do not double compress initial subscriptions

3 participants