Skip to content

Conversation

@gefjon
Copy link
Contributor

@gefjon gefjon commented Feb 27, 2025

Description of Changes

Revealed during John's review of clockworklabs/spacetime-docs#162 . Apparently this code doesn't get linted in CI, or something?

API and ABI breaking changes

If this is an API or ABI breaking change, please apply the
corresponding GitHub label.

Expected complexity level and risk

1

How complicated do you think these changes are? Grade on a scale from 1 to 5,
where 1 is a trivial change, and 5 is a deep-reaching and complex change.

This complexity rating applies not only to the complexity apparent in the diff,
but also to its interactions with existing and future code.

If you answered more than a 2, explain what is complex about the PR,
and what other components it interacts with in potentially concerning ways.

Testing

Describe any testing you've done, and any testing you'd like your reviewers to do,
so that you're confident that all the changes work as expected!

  • cargo clippy.
  • I ran through all of the actual behavior yesterday, and none the code has changed in a way that would affect that.

@gefjon gefjon requested a review from jdetter February 27, 2025 15:21
Copy link
Collaborator

@jdetter jdetter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested against latest spacetime CLI. Builds and runs with no errors or warnings 👍

@gefjon gefjon added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 3, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 0bb8316 Mar 3, 2025
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants