Skip to content

Conversation

@bfops
Copy link
Collaborator

@bfops bfops commented Jan 6, 2025

Description of Changes

spacetime energy status was renamed to spacetime energy balance, but only partially. This completely borked using the command with either name.

API and ABI breaking changes

This completes a previous API break.

Expected complexity level and risk

1

Testing

  • cargo run -- energy balance runs successfully now
{"balance":"0"}
  • Added a smoketest

@bfops bfops added the CLI only This change only affects the CLI behavior label Jan 6, 2025
@bfops bfops marked this pull request as ready for review January 6, 2025 16:19
@bfops bfops requested a review from cloutiertyler as a code owner January 6, 2025 16:19
@bfops bfops added the release-any To be landed in any release window label Jan 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@cloutiertyler cloutiertyler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love the regression test.

@bfops bfops added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 6, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 2967e3b Jan 6, 2025
10 checks passed
bfops added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2025
…t working (#2087)

Co-authored-by: Zeke Foppa <bfops@users.noreply.github.com>
@bfops bfops deleted the bfops/cli-fix-energy-balance branch April 9, 2025 19:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLI only This change only affects the CLI behavior release-any To be landed in any release window

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants