Added functionality for adding metadata using validate api

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -7,6 +7,10 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
 
 ## [Unreleased]
 
+## [1.0.12] - 2025-04-17
+
+- Support adding metadata in `validate()` method in Validator API.
+
 ## [1.0.11] - 2025-04-16
 
 - Update default thresholds for custom evals to 0.0 in `Validator` API.
@@ -59,7 +63,8 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
 
 - Initial release of the `cleanlab-codex` client library.
 
-[Unreleased]: https://github.com/cleanlab/cleanlab-codex/compare/v1.0.11...HEAD
+[Unreleased]: https://github.com/cleanlab/cleanlab-codex/compare/v1.0.12...HEAD
+[1.0.12]: https://github.com/cleanlab/cleanlab-codex/compare/v1.0.11...v1.0.12
 [1.0.11]: https://github.com/cleanlab/cleanlab-codex/compare/v1.0.10...v1.0.11
 [1.0.10]: https://github.com/cleanlab/cleanlab-codex/compare/v1.0.9...v1.0.10
 [1.0.9]: https://github.com/cleanlab/cleanlab-codex/compare/v1.0.8...v1.0.9

src/cleanlab_codex/__about__.py

@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
-__version__ = "1.0.11"
+__version__ = "1.0.12"

src/cleanlab_codex/internal/validator.py

@@ -13,6 +13,14 @@
 """Evaluation metrics (excluding trustworthiness) that are used to determine if a response is bad."""
 DEFAULT_EVAL_METRICS = ["response_helpfulness"]
 
+# Simple mappings for is_bad keys
+_SCORE_TO_IS_BAD_KEY = {
+    "trustworthiness": "is_not_trustworthy",
+    "query_ease": "is_not_query_easy",
+    "response_helpfulness": "is_not_response_helpful",
+    "context_sufficiency": "is_not_context_sufficient",
+}
+
 
 def get_default_evaluations() -> list[Eval]:
     """Get the default evaluations for the TrustworthyRAG.
@@ -51,3 +59,52 @@ def is_bad(score: Optional[float], threshold: float) -> bool:
             "is_bad": is_bad(score_dict["score"], thresholds.get_threshold(eval_name)),
         }
     return cast(ThresholdedTrustworthyRAGScore, thresholded_scores)
+
+
+def process_score_metadata(scores: ThresholdedTrustworthyRAGScore, thresholds: BadResponseThresholds) -> dict[str, Any]:
+    """Process scores into metadata format with standardized keys.
+
+    Args:
+        scores: The ThresholdedTrustworthyRAGScore containing evaluation results
+        thresholds: The BadResponseThresholds configuration
+
+    Returns:
+        dict: A dictionary containing evaluation scores and their corresponding metadata
+    """
+    metadata: dict[str, Any] = {}
+
+    # Process scores and add to metadata
+    for metric, score_data in scores.items():
+        metadata[metric] = score_data["score"]
+
+        # Add is_bad flags with standardized naming
+        is_bad_key = _SCORE_TO_IS_BAD_KEY.get(metric, f"is_not_{metric}")
+        metadata[is_bad_key] = score_data["is_bad"]
+
+        # Special case for trustworthiness explanation
+        if metric == "trustworthiness" and "log" in score_data and "explanation" in score_data["log"]:
+            metadata["explanation"] = score_data["log"]["explanation"]
+
+    # Add thresholds to metadata
+    thresholds_dict = thresholds.model_dump()
+    for metric in {k for k in scores if k not in thresholds_dict}:
+        thresholds_dict[metric] = thresholds.get_threshold(metric)
+    metadata["thresholds"] = thresholds_dict
+
+    # TODO: Remove this as the backend can infer this from the is_bad flags
+    metadata["label"] = _get_label(metadata)
+
+    return metadata
+
+
+def _get_label(metadata: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
+    def is_bad(metric: str) -> bool:
+        return bool(metadata.get(_SCORE_TO_IS_BAD_KEY[metric], False))
+
+    if is_bad("context_sufficiency"):
+        return "search_failure"
+    if is_bad("response_helpfulness") or is_bad("query_ease"):
+        return "unhelpful"
+    if is_bad("trustworthiness"):
+        return "hallucination"
+    return "other_issues"

src/cleanlab_codex/validator.py

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 
 from __future__ import annotations
 
+from copy import deepcopy
 from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, Callable, Optional, cast
 
 from cleanlab_tlm import TrustworthyRAG
@@ -13,6 +14,9 @@
     get_default_evaluations,
     get_default_trustworthyrag_config,
 )
+from cleanlab_codex.internal.validator import (
+    process_score_metadata as _process_score_metadata,
+)
 from cleanlab_codex.internal.validator import (
     update_scores_based_on_thresholds as _update_scores_based_on_thresholds,
 )
@@ -100,11 +104,14 @@ def __init__(
 
     def validate(
         self,
+        *,
         query: str,
         context: str,
         response: str,
         prompt: Optional[str] = None,
         form_prompt: Optional[Callable[[str, str], str]] = None,
+        metadata: Optional[dict[str, Any]] = None,
+        log_results: bool = True,
     ) -> dict[str, Any]:
         """Evaluate whether the AI-generated response is bad, and if so, request an alternate expert answer.
         If no expert answer is available, this query is still logged for SMEs to answer.
@@ -122,10 +129,16 @@ def validate(
                 - 'is_bad_response': True if the response is flagged as potentially bad, False otherwise. When True, a Codex lookup is performed, which logs this query into the Codex Project for SMEs to answer.
                 - Additional keys from a [`ThresholdedTrustworthyRAGScore`](/codex/api/python/types.validator/#class-thresholdedtrustworthyragscore) dictionary: each corresponds to a [TrustworthyRAG](/tlm/api/python/utils.rag/#class-trustworthyrag) evaluation metric, and points to the score for this evaluation as well as a boolean `is_bad` flagging whether the score falls below the corresponding threshold.
         """
-        scores, is_bad_response = self.detect(query, context, response, prompt, form_prompt)
+        scores, is_bad_response = self.detect(
+            query=query, context=context, response=response, prompt=prompt, form_prompt=form_prompt
+        )
         expert_answer = None
         if is_bad_response:
-            expert_answer = self._remediate(query)
+            final_metadata = deepcopy(metadata) if metadata else {}
+            if log_results:
+                processed_metadata = _process_score_metadata(scores, self._bad_response_thresholds)
+                final_metadata.update(processed_metadata)
+            expert_answer = self._remediate(query=query, metadata=final_metadata)
 
         return {
             "expert_answer": expert_answer,
@@ -135,11 +148,14 @@ def validate(
 
     async def validate_async(
         self,
+        *,
         query: str,
         context: str,
         response: str,
         prompt: Optional[str] = None,
         form_prompt: Optional[Callable[[str, str], str]] = None,
+        metadata: Optional[dict[str, Any]] = None,
+        log_results: bool = True,
     ) -> dict[str, Any]:
         """Evaluate whether the AI-generated response is bad, and if so, request an alternate expert answer.
         If no expert answer is available, this query is still logged for SMEs to answer.
@@ -158,9 +174,14 @@ async def validate_async(
                 - Additional keys from a [`ThresholdedTrustworthyRAGScore`](/codex/api/python/types.validator/#class-thresholdedtrustworthyragscore) dictionary: each corresponds to a [TrustworthyRAG](/tlm/api/python/utils.rag/#class-trustworthyrag) evaluation metric, and points to the score for this evaluation as well as a boolean `is_bad` flagging whether the score falls below the corresponding threshold.
         """
         scores, is_bad_response = await self.detect_async(query, context, response, prompt, form_prompt)
+        final_metadata = metadata.copy() if metadata else {}
+        if log_results:
+            processed_metadata = _process_score_metadata(scores, self._bad_response_thresholds)
+            final_metadata.update(processed_metadata)
+
         expert_answer = None
         if is_bad_response:
-            expert_answer = self._remediate(query)
+            expert_answer = self._remediate(query=query, metadata=final_metadata)
 
         return {
             "expert_answer": expert_answer,
@@ -170,6 +191,7 @@ async def validate_async(
 
     def detect(
         self,
+        *,
         query: str,
         context: str,
         response: str,
@@ -258,7 +280,7 @@ async def detect_async(
         is_bad_response = any(score_dict["is_bad"] for score_dict in thresholded_scores.values())
         return thresholded_scores, is_bad_response
 
-    def _remediate(self, query: str) -> str | None:
+    def _remediate(self, *, query: str, metadata: dict[str, Any] | None = None) -> str | None:
         """Request a SME-provided answer for this query, if one is available in Codex.
 
         Args:
@@ -267,7 +289,7 @@ def _remediate(self, query: str) -> str | None:
         Returns:
             str | None: The SME-provided answer from Codex, or None if no answer could be found in the Codex Project.
         """
-        codex_answer, _ = self._project.query(question=query)
+        codex_answer, _ = self._project.query(question=query, metadata=metadata)
         return codex_answer
 
 

tests/internal/test_validator.py

@@ -2,7 +2,12 @@
 
 from cleanlab_tlm.utils.rag import TrustworthyRAGScore
 
-from cleanlab_codex.internal.validator import get_default_evaluations
+from cleanlab_codex.internal.validator import (
+    get_default_evaluations,
+    process_score_metadata,
+    update_scores_based_on_thresholds,
+)
+from cleanlab_codex.types.validator import ThresholdedTrustworthyRAGScore
 from cleanlab_codex.validator import BadResponseThresholds
 
 
@@ -27,3 +32,79 @@ def make_is_bad_response_config(trustworthiness: float, response_helpfulness: fl
 
 def test_get_default_evaluations() -> None:
     assert {evaluation.name for evaluation in get_default_evaluations()} == {"response_helpfulness"}
+
+
+def test_process_score_metadata() -> None:
+    # Create test scores with various metrics
+    thresholded_scores = {
+        "trustworthiness": {"score": 0.8, "is_bad": False, "log": {"explanation": "Test explanation"}},
+        "response_helpfulness": {"score": 0.6, "is_bad": True},
+        "query_ease": {"score": 0.9, "is_bad": False},
+    }
+
+    thresholds = BadResponseThresholds(trustworthiness=0.7, response_helpfulness=0.7)
+
+    metadata = process_score_metadata(cast(ThresholdedTrustworthyRAGScore, thresholded_scores), thresholds)
+
+    # Check scores and flags
+    expected_metadata = {
+        "trustworthiness": 0.8,
+        "response_helpfulness": 0.6,
+        "query_ease": 0.9,
+        "is_not_trustworthy": False,
+        "is_not_response_helpful": True,
+        "is_not_query_easy": False,
+        "explanation": "Test explanation",
+        "thresholds": {"trustworthiness": 0.7, "response_helpfulness": 0.7, "query_ease": 0.0},
+        "label": "unhelpful",
+    }
+
+    assert metadata == expected_metadata
+
+
+def test_process_score_metadata_edge_cases() -> None:
+    """Test edge cases for process_score_metadata."""
+    thresholds = BadResponseThresholds()
+
+    # Test empty scores
+    metadata_for_empty_scores = process_score_metadata(cast(ThresholdedTrustworthyRAGScore, {}), thresholds)
+    assert {"thresholds", "label"} == set(metadata_for_empty_scores.keys())
+
+    # Test missing explanation
+    scores = cast(ThresholdedTrustworthyRAGScore, {"trustworthiness": {"score": 0.6, "is_bad": True}})
+    metadata_missing_explanation = process_score_metadata(scores, thresholds)
+    assert "explanation" not in metadata_missing_explanation
+
+    # Test custom metric
+    scores = cast(ThresholdedTrustworthyRAGScore, {"my_metric": {"score": 0.3, "is_bad": True}})
+    metadata_custom_metric = process_score_metadata(scores, thresholds)
+    assert metadata_custom_metric["my_metric"] == 0.3
+    assert metadata_custom_metric["is_not_my_metric"] is True
+
+
+def test_update_scores_based_on_thresholds() -> None:
+    """Test that update_scores_based_on_thresholds correctly flags scores based on thresholds."""
+    raw_scores = cast(
+        TrustworthyRAGScore,
+        {
+            "trustworthiness": {"score": 0.6},  # Below threshold
+            "response_helpfulness": {"score": 0.8},  # Above threshold
+            "custom_metric": {"score": 0.4},  # Below custom threshold
+            "another_metric": {"score": 0.6},  # Uses default threshold
+        },
+    )
+
+    thresholds = BadResponseThresholds(trustworthiness=0.7, response_helpfulness=0.7, custom_metric=0.45)  # type: ignore[call-arg]
+
+    scores = update_scores_based_on_thresholds(raw_scores, thresholds)
+
+    expected_is_bad = {
+        "trustworthiness": True,
+        "response_helpfulness": False,
+        "custom_metric": True,
+        "another_metric": False,
+    }
+
+    for metric, expected in expected_is_bad.items():
+        assert scores[metric]["is_bad"] is expected
+    assert all(scores[k]["score"] == raw_scores[k]["score"] for k in raw_scores)

tests/test_validator.py

@@ -137,10 +137,10 @@ def test_remediate(self, mock_project: Mock, mock_trustworthy_rag: Mock) -> None
         mock_project.from_access_key.return_value.query.return_value = ("expert answer", None)
 
         validator = Validator(codex_access_key="test")
-        result = validator._remediate("test query")  # noqa: SLF001
+        result = validator._remediate(query="test query")  # noqa: SLF001
 
         # Verify project.query was called
-        mock_project.from_access_key.return_value.query.assert_called_once_with(question="test query")
+        mock_project.from_access_key.return_value.query.assert_called_once_with(question="test query", metadata=None)
         assert result == "expert answer"
 
     def test_user_provided_thresholds(self, mock_project: Mock, mock_trustworthy_rag: Mock) -> None:  # noqa: ARG002