docs: Update multiline usage override rules #4267
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The styling of usage has changed in clap-rs#4188 such that the usage string is on the same line as the "Usage:" title. Previously, the usage went on the line below the title. As such, the rules have changed for how to make a multiline usage format correctly. These updated rules achieve the following output for the documented example: Usage: myapp -X [-a] [-b] <file> myapp -Y [-c] <file1> <file2> myapp -Z [-d|-e] Relates-to: clap-rs#4132
Member
|
Thanks! Sorry that I had missed this when making the change! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The styling of usage has changed in #4188 such that the usage string is on the same line as the "Usage:" title. Previously, the usage went on the line below the title. As such, the rules have changed for how to make a multiline usage format correctly.
These updated rules achieve the following output for the documented example:
Relates-to: #4132