Skip to content

Docs: Redo the editing engine guide images#19715

Merged
gorzelinski merged 9 commits intostablefrom
ck/5956
Feb 18, 2026
Merged

Docs: Redo the editing engine guide images#19715
gorzelinski merged 9 commits intostablefrom
ck/5956

Conversation

@godai78
Copy link
Contributor

@godai78 godai78 commented Jan 30, 2026

🚀 Summary

Docs: Redo the editing engine guide images


📌 Related issues


💡 Additional information

Optional: Notes on decisions, edge cases, or anything helpful for reviewers.


🧾 Checklists

Use the following checklists to ensure important areas were not overlooked.
This does not apply to feature-branch merges.
If an item is not relevant to this type of change, simply leave it unchecked.

Author checklist

  • Is the changelog entry intentionally omitted?
  • Is the change backward-compatible?
  • Have you considered the impact on different editor setups and core interactions? (e.g., classic/inline/multi-root/many editors, typing, selection, paste, tables, lists, images, collaboration, pagination)
  • Has the change been manually verified in the relevant setups?
  • Does this change affect any of the above?
  • Is performance impacted?
  • Is accessibility affected?
  • Have tests been added that fail without this change (against regression)?
  • Have the API documentation, guides, feature digest, and related feature sections been updated where needed?
  • Have metadata files (ckeditor5-metadata.json) been updated if needed?
  • Are there any changes the team should be informed about (e.g. architectural, difficult to revert in future versions or having impact on other features)?
  • Were these changes documented (in Logbook)?

Reviewer checklist

  • PR description explains the changes and the chosen approach (especially when performance, API, or UX is affected).
  • The changelog entry is clear, user‑ or integrator-facing, and it describes any breaking changes.
  • All new external dependencies have been approved and mentioned in LICENSE.md (if any).
  • All human-readable, translateable strings in this PR been introduced using t() (if any).
  • I manually verified the change (e.g., in manual tests or documentation).
  • The target branch is correct.

@godai78 godai78 marked this pull request as draft January 30, 2026 11:21
@gorzelinski gorzelinski marked this pull request as ready for review February 18, 2026 07:35
@gorzelinski gorzelinski self-requested a review February 18, 2026 08:24
@gorzelinski gorzelinski merged commit e4fcceb into stable Feb 18, 2026
10 checks passed
@gorzelinski gorzelinski deleted the ck/5956 branch February 18, 2026 09:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants