Ismael Soto
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice
Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters
South Bohemian Research Centre of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses
Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic
Prof Corey J. A. Bradshaw
Global Ecology | Partuyarta Ngadluku Wardli Kuu
Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
last updated August 2023
Accompanies paper:
Soto, I, P Balzani, L Carneiro, RN Cuthbert, R Macêdo, A Serhan Tarkan, DA Ahmed, A Bang, K Bacela-Spychalska, SA Bailey, T Baudry, L Ballesteros, A Bortolus, E Briski, JR Britton, M Buřič, M Camacho-Cervantes, C Cano-Barbacil, D Copilaș-Ciocianu, N Coughlan, P Courtois, Z Csabai, T Dalu, V De Santis, JWE Dickey, R Dimarco, J Falk-Andersson, R Fernandez, M Florencio, ACS Franco, E García-Berthou, D Giannetto, M Glavendekic, M Grabowski, G Heringer, I Herrera, W Huang, KL Kamelamela, NI Kirichenko, A Kouba, M Kourantidou, I Kurtul, G Laufer, B Lipták, C Liu, E López-López, V Lozano, S Mammola, A Marchini, V Meshkova, L Meyerson, M Milardi, DL Musolin, M Nuñez, FJ Oficialdegui, J Patoka, Z Pattision, A Petrusek, D Pincheira-Donoso, M Piria, A Probert, JJ Rasmussen, D Renault, F Ribeiro, G Rilov, TB Robinson, A Sanchez, E Schwindt, J South, P Stoett, H Verreycken, L Vilizzi, Y-J Wang, Y Watari, PM Wehi, A Weiperth, P Wiberg-Larsen, S Yapıcı, B Yoğurtçuoğlu, R Zenni, BS Galil, JTA Dick, J Russell, A Ricciardi, D Simberloff, CJA Bradshaw, PJ Haubrock. Taming the terminological tempest in invasion science. Biological Reviews (in review)
and preprint:
Soto, I, P Balzani, L Carneiro, RN Cuthbert, R Macêdo, A Serhan Tarkan, DA Ahmed, A Bang, K Bacela-Spychalska, SA Bailey, T Baudry, L Ballesteros, A Bortolus, E Briski, JR Britton, M Buřič, M Camacho-Cervantes, C Cano-Barbacil, D Copilaș-Ciocianu, N Coughlan, P Courtois, Z Csabai, T Dalu, V De Santis, JWE Dickey, R Dimarco, J Falk-Andersson, R Fernandez, M Florencio, ACS Franco, E García-Berthou, D Giannetto, M Glavendekic, M Grabowski, G Heringer, I Herrera, W Huang, KL Kamelamela, NI Kirichenko, A Kouba, M Kourantidou, I Kurtul, G Laufer, B Lipták, C Liu, E López-López, V Lozano, S Mammola, A Marchini, V Meshkova, L Meyerson, M Milardi, DL Musolin, M Nuñez, FJ Oficialdegui, J Patoka, Z Pattision, A Petrusek, D Pincheira-Donoso, M Piria, A Probert, JJ Rasmussen, D Renault, F Ribeiro, G Rilov, TB Robinson, A Sanchez, E Schwindt, J South, P Stoett, H Verreycken, L Vilizzi, Y-J Wang, Y Watari, PM Wehi, A Weiperth, P Wiberg-Larsen, S Yapıcı, B Yoğurtçuoğlu, R Zenni, BS Galil, JTA Dick, J Russell, A Ricciardi, D Simberloff, CJA Bradshaw, PJ Haubrock. Taming the terminological tempest in invasion science. EcoEvoRχiv doi:10.32942/X24C79
Standardized terminology in science is important for clarity of interpretation and communication. In invasion science — a dynamic and quickly evolving discipline — the rapid proliferation of technical terminology has lacked a standardized framework for its language development. The result is a convoluted and inconsistent usage of terminology, with various discrepancies in descriptions of damages and interventions. A standardized framework is therefore needed for a clear, universally applicable, and consistent terminology to promote more effective communication across researchers, stakeholders, and policymakers. Inconsistencies in terminology stem from the exponential increase in scientific publications on the patterns and processes of biological invasions authored by experts from various disciplines and countries since the 1990s, as well as publications by legislators and policymakers focusing on practical applications, regulations, and management of resources. Aligning and standardizing terminology across stakeholders remains a prevailing challenge in invasion science. Here, we review and evaluate the multiple terms used in invasion science (e.g. 'non-native', 'alien', 'invasive' or 'invader', 'exotic', 'non-indigenous', 'naturalized, 'pest') to propose a more simplified and standardized terminology. The streamlined framework we propose and translate into 28 other languages is based on the terms (i) 'non-native', denoting species transported beyond their natural biogeographic range, (ii) 'established non-native', i.e. those non-native species that have established self-sustaining populations in their new location(s) in the wild, and (iii) 'invasive non-native' — populations of established non-native species that have recently spread or are spreading rapidly in their invaded range actively or passively with or without human mediation. We also highlight the importance of conceptualizing 'spread' for classifying invasiveness and 'impact' for management. Finally, we propose a protocol for classifying populations based on (1) dispersal mechanism, (2) species origin, (3) population status, and (4) impact. Collectively and without introducing new terminology, the framework that we present aims to facilitate effective communication and collaboration in invasion science and management of non-native species.
Key words: biological invasion, classification, communication, non-English language, non-native, polysemy, synonymy
Invasion_terms.R
(compiled by Francisco J. Oficialdegui)
- termsWssp.csv: time series of term counts including 'species' (by year)
- termsWOssp.csv: time series of term counts excluding 'species' (by year)
- totalTermCount.csv: total counts per term over all time ('species' excluded from search terms)
- totalTermCountWspp.csv: total counts per term over all time ('species' included in search terms)