PG17 compatibility: Normalize COPY error messages - #7759
Merged
Naisila Puka (naisila) merged 1 commit intoNov 21, 2024
Conversation
Colm (colm-mchugh)
requested review from
Mehmet YILMAZ (m3hm3t),
Naisila Puka (naisila) and
Onur Tirtir (onurctirtir)
November 21, 2024 16:58
Contributor
Author
|
Note to reviewers: I changed the base branch to release-13.0. The relevant files for the fix are: Ignore the others. Thanks. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release-13.0 #7759 +/- ##
===============================================
Coverage ? 89.64%
===============================================
Files ? 274
Lines ? 59582
Branches ? 7436
===============================================
Hits ? 53411
Misses ? 4038
Partials ? 2133 |
45 tasks
Naisila Puka (naisila)
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2024
Naisila Puka (naisila)
left a comment
Naisila Puka (naisila)
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am a bit reluctant to add two normalize lines for two lines of affected tests, but also, I don't see another meaningful way of handling this other than deleting the test. So I guess we can add these normalize lines.
A recent Postgres commit (*) that refactored error messages is the cause of the diffs seen in pg16 regress test. The fix includes a normalization rule for the error messages so pg16 will pass when running with version 16 of Postgres. (*) https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=498ee9ee2f
Colm (colm-mchugh)
force-pushed
the
cmchugh/pg17-Normalize-COPY-Error_msg
branch
from
November 21, 2024 20:43
c0cd32d to
0156f48
Compare
Naisila Puka (naisila)
changed the title
Naisila Puka (naisila)
deleted the
cmchugh/pg17-Normalize-COPY-Error_msg
branch
November 21, 2024 21:45
Mehmet YILMAZ (m3hm3t)
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2024
A recent Postgres commit (*) that refactored error messages is the cause
of the diffs in pg16 regress test when running Citus on Postgres 17. The
fix changes the pg16 goldfile and includes a normalization rule for the
error messages so pg16 will pass when running with version 16 of
Postgres.
(*)
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=498ee9ee2f
Mehmet YILMAZ (m3hm3t)
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2024
A recent Postgres commit (*) that refactored error messages is the cause
of the diffs in pg16 regress test when running Citus on Postgres 17. The
fix changes the pg16 goldfile and includes a normalization rule for the
error messages so pg16 will pass when running with version 16 of
Postgres.
(*)
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=498ee9ee2f
Naisila Puka (naisila)
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 24, 2024
This is the final commit that adds PG17 compatibility with Citus's current capabilities. You can use Citus community, release-13.0 branch, with PG17.1. --------- Specifically, this commit: - Enables PG17 in the configure script. - Adds PG17 tests to CI using test images that have 17.1 - Fixes an upgrade test: see below for details In `citus_prepare_upgrade()`, don't drop any_value when upgrading from PG16+, because PG16+ has its own any_value function. Attempting to do so results in the error seen in [pg16-pg17 upgrade](https://github.com/citusdata/citus/actions/runs/11768444117/job/32778340003?pr=7661): ``` ERROR: cannot drop function any_value(anyelement) because it is required by the database system CONTEXT: SQL statement "DROP AGGREGATE IF EXISTS pg_catalog.any_value(anyelement)" ``` When 16 becomes the minimum supported Postgres version, the drop statements can be removed. --------- Several PG17 Compatibility commits have been merged before this final one. All these subtasks are done #7653 See the list below: Compilation PR: #7699 Ruleutils PR: #7725 Sister PR for tests: citusdata/the-process#159 Helpful smaller PRs: - #7714 - #7726 - #7731 - #7732 - #7733 - #7738 - #7745 - #7747 - #7748 - #7749 - #7752 - #7755 - #7757 - #7759 - #7760 - #7761 - #7762 - #7765 - #7766 - #7768 - #7769 - #7771 - #7774 - #7776 - #7780 - #7781 - #7785 - #7788 - #7793 - #7796 --------- Co-authored-by: Colm <colmmchugh@microsoft.com>
Naisila Puka (naisila)
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2025
A recent Postgres commit (*) that refactored error messages is the cause
of the diffs in pg16 regress test when running Citus on Postgres 17. The
fix changes the pg16 goldfile and includes a normalization rule for the
error messages so pg16 will pass when running with version 16 of
Postgres.
(*)
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=498ee9ee2f
Naisila Puka (naisila)
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2025
This is the final commit that adds PG17 compatibility with Citus's current capabilities. You can use Citus community, release-13.0 branch, with PG17.1. --------- Specifically, this commit: - Enables PG17 in the configure script. - Adds PG17 tests to CI using test images that have 17.1 - Fixes an upgrade test: see below for details In `citus_prepare_upgrade()`, don't drop any_value when upgrading from PG16+, because PG16+ has its own any_value function. Attempting to do so results in the error seen in [pg16-pg17 upgrade](https://github.com/citusdata/citus/actions/runs/11768444117/job/32778340003?pr=7661): ``` ERROR: cannot drop function any_value(anyelement) because it is required by the database system CONTEXT: SQL statement "DROP AGGREGATE IF EXISTS pg_catalog.any_value(anyelement)" ``` When 16 becomes the minimum supported Postgres version, the drop statements can be removed. --------- Several PG17 Compatibility commits have been merged before this final one. All these subtasks are done #7653 See the list below: Compilation PR: #7699 Ruleutils PR: #7725 Sister PR for tests: citusdata/the-process#159 Helpful smaller PRs: - #7714 - #7726 - #7731 - #7732 - #7733 - #7738 - #7745 - #7747 - #7748 - #7749 - #7752 - #7755 - #7757 - #7759 - #7760 - #7761 - #7762 - #7765 - #7766 - #7768 - #7769 - #7771 - #7774 - #7776 - #7780 - #7781 - #7785 - #7788 - #7793 - #7796 --------- Co-authored-by: Colm <colmmchugh@microsoft.com>
Naisila Puka (naisila)
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2025
A recent Postgres commit (*) that refactored error messages is the cause
of the diffs in pg16 regress test when running Citus on Postgres 17. The
fix changes the pg16 goldfile and includes a normalization rule for the
error messages so pg16 will pass when running with version 16 of
Postgres.
(*)
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=498ee9ee2f
Naisila Puka (naisila)
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2025
This is the final commit that adds PG17 compatibility with Citus's current capabilities. You can use Citus community, release-13.0 branch, with PG17.1. --------- Specifically, this commit: - Enables PG17 in the configure script. - Adds PG17 tests to CI using test images that have 17.1 - Fixes an upgrade test: see below for details In `citus_prepare_upgrade()`, don't drop any_value when upgrading from PG16+, because PG16+ has its own any_value function. Attempting to do so results in the error seen in [pg16-pg17 upgrade](https://github.com/citusdata/citus/actions/runs/11768444117/job/32778340003?pr=7661): ``` ERROR: cannot drop function any_value(anyelement) because it is required by the database system CONTEXT: SQL statement "DROP AGGREGATE IF EXISTS pg_catalog.any_value(anyelement)" ``` When 16 becomes the minimum supported Postgres version, the drop statements can be removed. --------- Several PG17 Compatibility commits have been merged before this final one. All these subtasks are done #7653 See the list below: Compilation PR: #7699 Ruleutils PR: #7725 Sister PR for tests: citusdata/the-process#159 Helpful smaller PRs: - #7714 - #7726 - #7731 - #7732 - #7733 - #7738 - #7745 - #7747 - #7748 - #7749 - #7752 - #7755 - #7757 - #7759 - #7760 - #7761 - #7762 - #7765 - #7766 - #7768 - #7769 - #7771 - #7774 - #7776 - #7780 - #7781 - #7785 - #7788 - #7793 - #7796 --------- Co-authored-by: Colm <colmmchugh@microsoft.com>
Naisila Puka (naisila)
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2025
A recent Postgres commit (*) that refactored error messages is the cause
of the diffs in pg16 regress test when running Citus on Postgres 17. The
fix changes the pg16 goldfile and includes a normalization rule for the
error messages so pg16 will pass when running with version 16 of
Postgres.
(*)
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=498ee9ee2f
Naisila Puka (naisila)
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2025
This is the final commit that adds PG17 compatibility with Citus's current capabilities. You can use Citus community, release-13.0 branch, with PG17.1. --------- Specifically, this commit: - Enables PG17 in the configure script. - Adds PG17 tests to CI using test images that have 17.1 - Fixes an upgrade test: see below for details In `citus_prepare_upgrade()`, don't drop any_value when upgrading from PG16+, because PG16+ has its own any_value function. Attempting to do so results in the error seen in [pg16-pg17 upgrade](https://github.com/citusdata/citus/actions/runs/11768444117/job/32778340003?pr=7661): ``` ERROR: cannot drop function any_value(anyelement) because it is required by the database system CONTEXT: SQL statement "DROP AGGREGATE IF EXISTS pg_catalog.any_value(anyelement)" ``` When 16 becomes the minimum supported Postgres version, the drop statements can be removed. --------- Several PG17 Compatibility commits have been merged before this final one. All these subtasks are done #7653 See the list below: Compilation PR: #7699 Ruleutils PR: #7725 Sister PR for tests: citusdata/the-process#159 Helpful smaller PRs: - #7714 - #7726 - #7731 - #7732 - #7733 - #7738 - #7745 - #7747 - #7748 - #7749 - #7752 - #7755 - #7757 - #7759 - #7760 - #7761 - #7762 - #7765 - #7766 - #7768 - #7769 - #7771 - #7774 - #7776 - #7780 - #7781 - #7785 - #7788 - #7793 - #7796 --------- Co-authored-by: Colm <colmmchugh@microsoft.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A recent Postgres commit (*) that refactored error messages is the cause of the diffs in pg16 regress test when running Citus on Postgres 17. The fix changes the pg16 goldfile and includes a normalization rule for the error messages so pg16 will pass when running with version 16 of Postgres.
(*) https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=498ee9ee2f