-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
Issue #17298: Enabled JavadocBlankLines IDEA inspection #17499
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@romani I've pushed the pull with enabled inspection to show CI error, but I'm not really sure how to fix it. There are many problems , but this is one of it
checkstyle/src/main/java/com/puppycrawl/tools/checkstyle/checks/NewlineAtEndOfFileCheck.java Lines 45 to 54 in 300fb08
|
This bus definitely defect in inspection. |
This PR is blocked by #17280 |
@SteLeo1602 |
Its working as expected |
<inspection_tool class="IteratorNextDoesNotThrowNoSuchElementException" enabled="true" | ||
level="WARNING" enabled_by_default="true"/> | ||
<!-- disabled until https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/17298 --> | ||
<inspection_tool class="JavadocBlankLines" enabled="false" level="WARNING" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<inspection_tool class="JavadocBlankLines" enabled="true" level="WARNING"
level="WARNING" enabled_by_default="true"/> | ||
<!-- disabled until https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/17298 --> | ||
<inspection_tool class="JavadocBlankLines" enabled="false" level="WARNING" | ||
enabled_by_default="false"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
enabled_by_default="true"/>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Works good on local, thanks
f260d9d
to
5312a79
Compare
@SteLeo1602 |
The inspection itself already used to be enabled without any errors until I replaced I believe we want inspection to react properly on what we already have in javadoc since clearly it's broken and does not function properly on CI basis. |
Issue #17298
STILL WIP