-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue #15967: fix yield fails indentation in switch with forceStrictCondition #16131
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Github, generate report for Indentation/all-examples-in-one |
Report for Indentation/all-examples-in-one: |
3e7d572
to
cd71ef5
Compare
Github, generate report for Indentation/all-examples-in-one |
Report for Indentation/all-examples-in-one: |
cd71ef5
to
62e609c
Compare
Github, generate report for Indentation/all-examples-in-one |
Report for Indentation/all-examples-in-one: |
62e609c
to
d013287
Compare
Github, generate report for Indentation/all-examples-in-one |
Report for Indentation/all-examples-in-one: |
d013287
to
64352f4
Compare
Github, generate report for Indentation/all-examples-in-one |
Report for Indentation/all-examples-in-one: |
Github, generate report for Indentation/Example2 |
@romani please check out regression report #16131 (comment) basically it resolves the original problem for which issue is raised. there is just one false positive case other report : #16131 (comment)
ps: please ignore diff reports which are not linked in this comment |
64352f4
to
df5c745
Compare
Github, generate report for Indentation/all-examples-in-one |
Report for Indentation/all-examples-in-one: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
items:
...ycrawl/tools/checkstyle/checks/indentation/indentation/InputIndentationYieldForceStrict.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…trictCondition fix
df5c745
to
2788f16
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good to merge !!
thanks a lot !
@romani please reply to comment at #16131 (comment) @mohitsatr please rebase on the latest master branch |
yes, lets create separate issue on this case, we can improve lateron on this. |
fixes #15967