fix(agent): enforce managed app contracts - #264
Merged
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
Production app-builder QA showed that managed runs still advertised
code_start_dev_serverthrough Mastra client tools, models attempted to replace the prepared Next.js template with Vite, and otherwise valid browser actions failed because placeholder null fields were mandatory. These behaviors wasted run time and could leave verification incomplete.What changed
clientToolsregistry itself for managed and skill-creator runspnpm add/pnpm remove, builds, and all imported-repository capabilitiesVerification
pnpm lintpnpm typecheckpnpm turbo build --forcepnpm deadcodepnpm architecture:checkpnpm turbo skills:build