-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
add group images #4905
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add group images #4905
Conversation
2b71bbb
to
da0a5a1
Compare
i'd be fine with trying this. |
da0a5a1
to
f7c90d6
Compare
well, what whatsapp is doing for group images then :) for emoji-avatars: this is a hack anyways, coming a bit from times where we did not had avatars. the emoji is still visible in the title - and ppl can always use an image. the gist of this issue, to better distinguish between groups and one-to-ones, while not cluttering UI with additional states and elements, i think this rules some emoji-hacks |
i do not know, if emoji-avatars are really a thing, i would be for closing and not merging. all in all +0.1 :) but i do not really care - i closed the old pr for reasons of not having incredible discussions :) |
I would rather do this icon thing in the UI instead of the letter. we could implement a detection algorithm in nom based on the emoji unicode ranges that can be found in the regex we use in desktop: |
Why would you need nom to detect if the first letter is emoji?
|
This still needs an API to tell if the avatar can be deleted or not. |
What if users could choose whether to use an image, a letter, or an emoji, like in macOS? As long as the programming effort isn't too much. |
It was buggy because it was possible to "remove" the default profile icon in the UI See also #4905 where r10s wanted to add a default image for groups, but which was closed.
It was buggy because it was possible to "remove" the default profile icon in the UI See also #4905 where r10s wanted to add a default image for groups, but which was closed.
this pr adds a fallback group image if no group image is set, making groups and one-to-one-chats easier to distinguish, maybe mitigating confusions as of #4902 .
this is also what whatsapp is doing.
also it looks nicer imo :)
disadvantage is that different groups look more similar, however, this is probably a minor as one can easily set group images (whereas you cannot set images for other ppl and this is also not planned)
a minor technical issue is that you can no longer differ between "image not set" and "fallback image" - i checked recent UI, however, that also seems not to be needed currently - and if required, we can always add that.
resurrection a part of #2708