Skip to content

Conversation

@MikeHolman
Copy link
Contributor

We only really need to know if a property ID is numeric, rest of property record was only being used for debug output.

unsigned int newRecordCount;
unsigned int newPropertyCount;
[size_is(reclaimedPropertyCount)] int * reclaimedPropertyIdArray;
[size_is(newRecordCount)] PropertyRecordIDL ** newRecordArray;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PropertyRecordIDL [](start = 30, length = 17)

remove PropertyRecordIDL definition?


ThreadContext * GetInProcThreadContext() const
{
if (JITManager::GetJITManager()->IsOOPJITEnabled())
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JITManager::GetJITManager()->IsOOPJITEnabled() [](start = 12, length = 46)

change to assertion only?

propertySym->m_stackSym->Dump(flags, valueType);
Js::PropertyRecord const* fieldName = propertySym->m_func->GetThreadContextInfo()->GetPropertyRecord(propertySym->m_propertyId);
Output::Print(_u("->%s"), fieldName->GetBuffer());
if (JITManager::GetJITManager()->IsOOPJITEnabled())
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

!

@leirocks
Copy link
Contributor

:shipit:

@MikeHolman MikeHolman force-pushed the proprecord branch 3 times, most recently from 1abb8a1 to 2eabdc7 Compare October 18, 2016 00:20
@chakrabot chakrabot merged commit afd7de4 into chakra-core:master Oct 18, 2016
chakrabot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2016
Merge pull request #1738 from MikeHolman:proprecord

We only really need to know if a property ID is numeric, rest of property record was only being used for debug output.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants