Add minimal example for pnpm #2690
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for ornate-narwhal-088216 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Most of my suggestions are small things, some of which can probably be ignored.
However, I hit an error that stopped me from being able to complete the tech test, but this may be just a misstep on my part. If that's the case and it's obvious to you where I went wrong, let me know and I can approve it.
| from Chainguard Libraries. | ||
|
|
||
| ```shell | ||
| pnpm add commander@4.1.1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
things started going haywire for me here:
mark@mark-chainguard:~/pnpm-example$ pnpm add commander@4.1.1
WARN GET https://libraries.cgr.dev/javascript/commander error (ERR_INVALID_CHAR). Will retry in 10 seconds. 2 retries left.
WARN GET https://libraries.cgr.dev/javascript/commander error (ERR_INVALID_CHAR). Will retry in 1 minute. 1 retries left.
ERR_PNPM_META_FETCH_FAIL GET https://libraries.cgr.dev/javascript/commander: Invalid character in header content ["authorization"]
This error happened while installing a direct dependency of /home/mark/pnpm-example
There's a good chance I just missed something but afaict I was following the given instructions
|
|
||
| ### Minimal example project | ||
|
|
||
| Use the following steps to create a minimal example project for pnpm with |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I swear the pnpm site is trying to annoy me specifically: https://pnpm.io/
Navigating there from google, I've seen it styled as pnpm, PNPm, and pnPm. I don't know why/how it would ever show up differently
There was a problem hiding this comment.
their docs go with pnpm so you're all set here, but why is it like this??
| pnpm init | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| For simple testing, you can use direct access and environment variables as |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| For simple testing, you can use direct access and environment variables as | |
| For testing purposes, you can use direct access and environment variables as |
I'd avoid "simple" when possible
|
|
||
| For simple testing, you can use direct access and environment variables as | ||
| detailed in the [access documentation](/chainguard/libraries/access/#env). Once | ||
| the environment variables are set, the following steps configure the registry |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| the environment variables are set, the following steps configure the registry | |
| the environment variables are set, the following steps configure registry |
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| Add dependencies for your project into the `package.json` file to test retrieval | ||
| from Chainguard Libraries. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| from Chainguard Libraries. | |
| from Chainguard Libraries: |
| pnpm list | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| Find the downloaded package in `node_modules/.pnpm/commander@4.1.1`. The |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Find the downloaded package in `node_modules/.pnpm/commander@4.1.1`. The | |
| Following this, you can find the downloaded package in `node_modules/.pnpm/commander@4.1.1`. The |
| Find the downloaded package in `node_modules/.pnpm/commander@4.1.1`. The | ||
| commands also result in the creation of the lock file `pnpm-lock.yaml`. | ||
|
|
||
| Adjust the registry configuration to use your repository manager and any other |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Adjust the registry configuration to use your repository manager and any other | |
| You can adjust the registry configuration to use your repository manager and any other |
2 participants
Fix https://github.com/chainguard-dev/internal/issues/5434