Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated the proposal expiration logic #196

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2024

Conversation

soloseng
Copy link
Contributor

@soloseng soloseng commented Apr 2, 2024

Description

Addressed issues highlited by CLST-5

@soloseng soloseng self-assigned this Apr 2, 2024
Copy link

Updated the proposal expiration logic

Generated at commit: 6233aa43cd231dcc8c37768b3c708f2f32e78b05

🚨 Report Summary

Severity Level Results
Contracts Critical
High
Medium
Low
Note
Total
1
2
0
8
28
39
Dependencies Critical
High
Medium
Low
Note
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0

For more details view the full report in OpenZeppelin Code Inspector

@soloseng soloseng mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2024
@soloseng soloseng merged commit 13c6fb2 into releases/3 Apr 2, 2024
3 checks passed
soloseng added a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
* updated the proposal expiration logic (#196)

* performed check on from group balance (#197)

* removed unused error (#198)

* Soloseng/audit-fix-clst-1 (#199)

* performed check on from group balance

* switch getCeloForGroup to public function

* Alfajores release 3 (#200)

* alfajores contract release

* updated deployed contract abis

* Updated deploy script to use existing libraby

* - updated DefaultStrategy main ABI
- Removed unused solc input

* tooling to generate MultiSig proposal payload for v3 contract upgrade

* ++ multisig edge case test

* hardcoded multisig signer address

* Soloseng/mainnet-release-3 (#201)

* updated to fix local testing that deploy a new contract instance

* updated test as `scheduleTransfer()` no longer allows transfers when `celoAvailableForGroup` is too low

* only set multisig impersonator when needed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants