Skip to content

Conversation

@jwang47
Copy link
Contributor

@jwang47 jwang47 commented Feb 27, 2015

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

make this an abstract class with the default implementation just log and response with 500

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

or maybe not even need to be abstract class.

@jwang47 jwang47 force-pushed the feature/exception-handler branch 2 times, most recently from 1037d74 to 1bf94a4 Compare February 27, 2015 01:05
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you just make this constructor to call the other one?

@jwang47 jwang47 force-pushed the feature/exception-handler branch 4 times, most recently from d15e5a9 to d6da219 Compare February 27, 2015 19:13
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can be a local field in the constructor. You should see a warning in IntelliJ.

@chtyim
Copy link
Contributor

chtyim commented Feb 27, 2015

Two minor comments. Rest LGTM.

@jwang47 jwang47 force-pushed the feature/exception-handler branch from d6da219 to 67f382f Compare February 27, 2015 21:15
jwang47 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2015
@jwang47 jwang47 merged commit 07418d7 into develop Feb 27, 2015
@jwang47 jwang47 deleted the feature/exception-handler branch February 27, 2015 21:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants